Tribonacci Numbers | Re: Factor
a year ago by Andy
a year ago by Andy
a year ago by Andy
Asserting Implications – Re: Factor
a year ago by Andy
a year ago by Andy
One Billion Loops – Re: Factor
a year ago by Andy
Command Arguments | Re: Factor
a year ago by Andy
a year ago by Andy
Tiny Great Languages: MOUSE (2024)
a year ago by Andy
LeoMehraban/factor-lsp: A buggy lsp for factor
a year ago by Andy
Nix Developer Setup for Factor | toastal
a year ago by Andy
a year ago by Andy
a year ago by Andy
a year ago by Andy
1x Forth by Charles Moore 4/13/99
a year ago by Andy
Color Prettyprint | Re: Factor
a year ago by Andy
a year ago by Andy
@programming.dev
Hello!
This space is for sharing news, experiences, announcements, questions, showcases, etc. regarding concatenative programming concepts and tools.
We'll also take any programming described as:
From Wikipedia:
A concatenative programming language is a point-free computer programming language in which all expressions denote functions, and the juxtaposition of expressions denotes function composition. Concatenative programming replaces function application, which is common in other programming styles, with function composition as the default way to build subroutines.
For example, a sequence of operations in an applicative language like the following:
y = foo(x)
z = bar(y)
w = baz(z)
...is written in a concatenative language as a sequence of functions:
x foo bar baz
Let me know if I've got any of these misplaced!
go to feed...
@programming.dev
Hello!
This space is for sharing news, experiences, announcements, questions, showcases, etc. regarding concatenative programming concepts and tools.
We'll also take any programming described as:
From Wikipedia:
A concatenative programming language is a point-free computer programming language in which all expressions denote functions, and the juxtaposition of expressions denotes function composition. Concatenative programming replaces function application, which is common in other programming styles, with function composition as the default way to build subroutines.
For example, a sequence of operations in an applicative language like the following:
y = foo(x)
z = bar(y)
w = baz(z)
...is written in a concatenative language as a sequence of functions:
x foo bar baz
Let me know if I've got any of these misplaced!
go to feed...