That post seems to be missing.

moozogew 2 points 3 years ago

We absolutely need more trams but this image is slightly misleading as it assumes all the cars are going to the same place as the tram - integrated transport networks are really complex and I worry that if we try to gloss over those complexities it'll make it harder to convince people to take it seriously

save

path: 0 851255, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4

Martineski 4 points 3 years ago

Replace the tram with a bus and you get the same thing driving everywhere the road is. And if you look at the name of the sub you will see that it's not like we are agains ALL cars, only most of them. Cars are way to go for some edge scenarios that can't be accomplished even with a very good public transport and micromobility.

Edit: and why would the average person need to care about complexity of public transport? All they need to do is to get on the ride and get where they need to be.

save

path: 0 851255 851629, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2

Novice_Idiot 3 points 3 years ago

Cities -> bikes + robust public transport. Country side, cars to get around the countryside and busses to get to the closest railway station

save

path: 0 851255 851629 866655, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1

Martineski 4 points 3 years ago

To continue my argument, NOONE I know cares about the complexity of building new roads but government is still throws money at them building more of them with no problem. The average person only uses the infrastructure it's up to government to set everything up for people.

save

path: 0 851255 851896, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...