Tennessee after-school Satan club holds first meeting despite protests

3 years ago by Lee Duna to c/news

Club flyer says Satanic Temple is a non-theistic religion and does ‘not attempt to convert children to any religious ideology’
load all comments
osarusan 213 points 3 years ago

What infuriates me about articles like this is that it really should just say that the school Satanic Club had its first meeting, the kids had a great time, here's everything they did and what they plan to do for the year, and here are some kids' reactions and quotes about the club.

Instead, it says the kids had "a great time" and then moves on to the protesters, offering them several paragraphs to spew their vile hate speech, repeating the garbage that their hate-filled signs say, and then even quoting two people. And then it follows that with basically an advertisement for "the Good News club, a Christian evangelical Bible club that meets before school hours."

It's a sign of how biased society is towards religion that an article about a non-theistic after school club gives half of the article to a handful of religious bigots to let them spew their hate speech and then promotes their own Christian school club.

path: 0 6602076, hotness: undefined, score: 213, children: 34
Tristaniopsis -23 points 3 years ago

I think you’re whoooshing the article. Let the author breathe and give them credit for parsing the subject in a carefully neutral manner whilst yet getting something of import across.

path: 0 6602076 6616746, hotness: undefined, score: -23, children: 12
SiegeRhino 33 points 3 years ago

when "one side" wants to take away everyone's rights and burn down the planet, I think the "both sides" neutrality arguments should fuckin STOP

path: 0 6602076 6616746 6619975, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 4
Tristaniopsis -2 points 3 years ago

Reporting the reactions of both sides is technically neutral.

However I totally agree that ‘both sides-ing’ in terms of legitimising shitty views is unhealthy. I think the piece does not legitimise the xtian views as much as holding them up as the entrenched mindset that the SC is trying to (rightly) break.

path: 0 6602076 6616746 6619975 6632463, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
EatATaco -3 points 3 years ago

Why on earth are people so angry at this for simply reporting the facts? This comment section is fucking hilariously nuts right now. Lol

path: 0 6602076 6616746 6619975 6624379, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 2
Tristaniopsis -2 points 3 years ago

Indeed. I certainly do not support the xtian whackos. And the Satanic club sounds like great thing.

The Guardian is definitely a left-leaning paper so accusations of bias against the ‘satanic club’ is likely not true.

I think the reporting is accurate in that it’s telling the reader about the reaction ‘on the ground’ to this piece of social progress, by the parochial xtians.

People are left to read what they want into the reporting (neutral) but I really don’t think it’s ‘promoting’ the xtian view.

path: 0 6602076 6616746 6619975 6624379 6632351, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 1
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
39525
40317
9841

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...