Car crashes on Swiss road, response is to ban bikes

3 years ago by mondoman712 to c/fuck_cars

Vor einem Jahr war beim Wolfsprung zwischen Brunnen und Sisikon ein Auto in den Vierwaldstättersee gestürzt. Jetzt reagiert der Bund.

https://www.tagesanzeiger.ch/...

Sorry I couldn't find an article on this in English, but to summarise: there was a bad crash on this rather dangerous road, and the response from the federal roads office, along with lowing the speed limit slightly and adding barriers, is to ban bikes from riding here.

For some context, this road is on the edge of a lake, with mountains on the other side. There is no reasonable alternative for cyclists. Whereas for drivers using this as a through-route (it is part of a major north-south access), there is a large tunnelled motorway on the other side of the lake that would be a minor detour for most. This is all while another road is being constructed to parallel this one at the cost of CHF 1.2 Billion, to be completed in 2033.

They are nice enough to offer an hourly shuttle for up to 16 cyclists at a time.

I think it's absurd that cyclists again get the short end of the stick when one driver is unable to control their vehicle (with no cyclists involved). And the speed limit is kept as high as 60km/h when clearly the road should be for local use only where a much lower limit would make sense, and longer distance traffic rerouted to the other side of the lake (which is an extra 10km if you're heading further south from Zurich for example).

load all comments
Duchess 32 points 3 years ago

maybe it's just me but i really don't understand the logic here. bikes had nothing to do with this incident, why was a bike ban even considered?

path: 0 932349, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 11
FeliXTV27 13 points 3 years ago

The road is too narrow and curvy for cars to overtake cyclists without too much danger.

path: 0 932349 933516, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 8
Duchess 7 points 3 years ago

ah, i guess that makes a little sense, although it sounds more like the road itself is the problem

path: 0 932349 933516 933974, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 7
veganpizza69 8 points 3 years ago

The Swiss do have a strong biking culture, but it's less strong than the car one. Places with mountains tend to have narrow roads.

The Swiss also suffer from too many trucks and not enough trains used for cargo.

path: 0 932349 941767, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
mondoman712 8 points 3 years ago path: 0 932349 941767 942889, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
fuck_cars
fuck_cars

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
13432
845
240

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

  • to raise awareness around the dangers, inefficiencies and injustice that can come from car dependence.
  • to allow a place to discuss and promote more healthy transport methods and ways of living.

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

go to feed...