✨️ Finish him. ✨️

2 years ago by fossilesque to c/science_memes

load all comments
qjkxbmwvz 90 points 2 years ago

I like the sentiment, but there are non-peer reviewed papers that are real science. Politics and funding are real things, and there is a bit of gatekeeping here, which isn't really good IMHO.

Also, reproducibility is a sticky subject, especially with immoral experiments (which can still be the product of science, however unsavory), or experiments for which there are only one apparatus in the world (e.g., some particle physics).

path: 0 10340810, hotness: undefined, score: 90, children: 13
CleoTheWizard 19 points 2 years ago

The things you’re describing are not science. This might seem nit picky but the scientific method as we know it today require that peer review and require methods of reproduction. Whether you can reproduce results is a different story.

The entire difference between research and science is whether or not you engage in the process of peer review and review often requires method of replication. So you usually can’t have one without the other. If you aren’t trying to have your paper reviewed by your peers, that’s fine, but that isn’t science.

To address the gatekeeping, I get it. We shouldn’t be using the word to demean people who do valuable research but don’t strictly engage in the scientific process. That’s really not important to do. However we should all be interested in preventing the scientific process from being muddied to include every R&D process under the sun. That’s all research, not science, and we call them separate things for a reason.

path: 0 10340810 10343585, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 11
kernelle 16 points 2 years ago

I think the word you're looking for is merit, publication which are cited and peer reviewed hold much more merit than those who don't.

Science is a rigorous, systematic endeavor that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the world. 1

Nothing in this quote requires external publication. Following the scientific method, publishing, peer reviewing and reproduction can all happen internally in organisation using independent teams. Those private publications hold but a fraction of the merit of publications in recognised journals, but are science nonetheless.

path: 0 10340810 10343585 10345434, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 5
Schadrach 7 points 2 years ago

This might seem nit picky but the scientific method as we know it today require that peer review and require methods of reproduction. Whether you can reproduce results is a different story.

Oooh, are we about to have a discussion on whether large portions of the soft sciences across the past several decades fail to be "real" science due to the reproducibility crisis?

path: 0 10340810 10343585 10349854, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
WhatIsH2O4 2 points 2 years ago

Counterpoint: the scientific method is much simpler than you described.

  1. Fuck around
  2. Find out
  3. Write it down

The rest are details of the above or elitism.

path: 0 10340810 10343585 10361019, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
someacnt_ 2 points 2 years ago

Imo both in the twitter are stupid. Like, no way engaging with musk could go well.

path: 0 10340810 10359319, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
science_memes
science_memes

@mander.xyz

login for more options
21158
7343
835

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

go to feed...