‘The Movement to Convince Biden to Not Run Is Real’

2 years ago by girlfreddy to c/news

One House Democrat said he spoke for others in the wake of the president’s stunningly feeble debate performance on Thursday: “The movement to convince Biden to not run is real.”

The House member, an outspoken defender of the president, said that House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer should consider “a combined effort” to nudge President Joe Biden out of the race.

Crestfallen by the president’s weak voice, pallid appearance and meandering answers, numerous Democratic officials said Biden’s bet on an early debate to rebut unceasing questions about his age had not only backfired but done damage that may prove irreversible. The president had, in the first 30 minutes of the debate, fully affirmed doubts about his fitness.

A second House Democrat said “reflection is needed” from Biden about the way ahead and indicated the private text threads among lawmakers were even more dire, with some saying outright that the president needed to drop out of the race.

load all comments
Xyre 55 points 2 years ago

This is how Bernie can still win! /s

In the off chance they do replace him, they're going to force the worst possible candidate on us (Kamala?). Because what else are you going to do, let the bad guy win?

path: 0 10880913, hotness: undefined, score: 55, children: 28
originalucifer 14 points 2 years ago

It would be newsom

path: 0 10880913 10881751, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 8
bobburger 27 points 2 years ago path: 0 10880913 10881751 10882170, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 1
WanderingVentra 9 points 2 years ago

Not worth the risk to lose his governorship for a shot in the dark. I don't know why the Democrat Party hasn't been building alternatives for the last 4 years. Hell, I only recall seeing Harris when she was yelling at poor immigrants to stay away. They failed this country.

path: 0 10880913 10881751 10887500, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
mysticpickle 2 points 2 years ago

Jesus fuck no. He's basically Hillary 2.0

path: 0 10880913 10881751 10885378, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Xyre 0 points 2 years ago

It feels like he's inevitable at this point. 🙁

path: 0 10880913 10881751 10881881, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
girlfreddy 6 points 2 years ago

Why would Kamala be the worst candidate?

path: 0 10880913 10881368, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 18
Xyre 40 points 2 years ago

A bland and unprincipled candidate whose positions shift based on polling numbers. Not to mention her prosecutorial background and close proximity to SF corruption scandals makes her an easy target.

path: 0 10880913 10881368 10881767, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 0
ganksy 22 points 2 years ago

She's not worse than Biden but not great. He should have chosen Stacey Abrams.

path: 0 10880913 10881368 10881563, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 7
Count042 21 points 2 years ago

Everyone hates her for very good reasons.

There is a reason California didn't vote for her.

path: 0 10880913 10881368 10883029, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 5
hightrix 17 points 2 years ago

Running Kamala would be making the same mistake they made back in 2016. She is polarizing, and extremely unlikeable. Anyone that worked with her or her department when she was in law in CA has nothing but bad things to say about her.

Running Kamala would be giving Trump a second term.

path: 0 10880913 10881368 10888536, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
JJROKCZ 6 points 2 years ago

She’s not white and female, those reasons alone mean she’s lost over a quarter of the nation.

path: 0 10880913 10881368 10885430, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
39536
40335
9822

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...