Steam doesn’t want to pay arbitration fees, tells gamers to sue instead

2 years ago by umami_wasabi to c/gaming

Valve previously sued a law firm in attempt to stop mass arbitration claims.
load all comments
away2thestars 5 points 2 years ago

Anyone can ELI5 this thing? I'm pretty lost

path: 0 12604871, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 3
Stern 12 points 2 years ago

Twofold: One, they lost a case in arbitration that basically said arbitration isn't usable.

Two: Lot of companies do arbitration to avoid court, which works fine and is cheaper if you're not getting taken to court much. If 75,000 people that could do a class action suit all go to arbitration though, the benefit is lost. Lawyers threatened that. 3 grand a arbitration case x 75,000 people == 225 million dollars on fees alone.

path: 0 12604871 12605302, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 2
away2thestars 2 points 2 years ago

Thank you, when does steam need to do arbitration?

path: 0 12604871 12605302 12606944, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
gaming
gaming

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
28872
1638
776

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

  • 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
  • 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
  • 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

go to feed...