Twitter is now X as the little blue bird disappears

3 years ago by mastermind to c/technology

The new X logo has started replacing the blue bird on the web.
load all comments
UnknownQuantity 124 points 3 years ago

So let me get this straight. Musk bought Twitter for 44 billion, fired most of the staff, destroyed bunch of features and functionality, scared advertisers away and now changed the brand's name. Wouldn't it be less hassle to just start a platform and pay people $100 each as a sign up bonus?

path: 0 1664591, hotness: undefined, score: 124, children: 7
wjrii 65 points 3 years ago

That's absurd! Assuming 4 billion in actual startup costs, at the purchase price they could only afford to do that for...

four hundred million people. LOL.

Jesus this was a dumb transaction.

path: 0 1664591 1665530, hotness: undefined, score: 65, children: 3
FlyingSquid 26 points 3 years ago

Just for perspective, the U.S. population is 300 million. Add on the 67 million population of the UK and you still have plenty of change left over.

Jesus, this was a stupid decision.

path: 0 1664591 1665530 1667744, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 1
min_fapper 7 points 3 years ago

Damn, this comment thread was a level of enlightenment I was not expecting this morning 🤯

path: 0 1664591 1665530 1668597, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Ryumast3r 12 points 3 years ago

There are currently ~366 million Twitter users.

If Musk paid each person $100 to start using "X" instead, he'd spend $36.6 billion, leaving him with $7.4 billion to actually build the rest of the website and infrastructure.

Yup, he's stupid.

path: 0 1664591 1686288, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
UnknownQuantity 4 points 3 years ago

He could also pay his rent and other bills.

path: 0 1664591 1686288 1687522, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
athos77 7 points 3 years ago

Copying my comment from another thread:

But they're not just re-branding. Twitter is now under some kind of corporate shell company. I haven't seen much coverage of that, but my suspicion is that it's intended to act as some kind of insulator to contain Twitter's debts.

Like when they break a company into pieces and put everyone's debts and no assets into a single part and then that part declares bankruptcy and all the debt magically goes away, leaving everything else with lots of assets and no debts and a future that looks really rosy. I can't help but think that this is something similar to that.

path: 0 1664591 1682401, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
87401
21272
15822

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...