Do posts from instances that don't allow downvotes have an unfair advantage?

3 years ago by ram to c/fediverse

By advantage I mean posts from those instances receiving more visibility than others on feeds that sort by score (active, hot, top).

There seems to be at least two ways in which posts from instances that don't allow downvotes receive an advantage:

  • They don't federate downvotes. That means other instances only count downvotes from their own users but not from the rest of the fediverse.
  • A downvote sometimes can be counted and federated as an upvote. This happens when you first upvote a post and then change it to a downvote.

Let's see an example. Suppose we are a user from instance A that allows downvotes and we want to vote a post on instance B that doesn't allow downvotes. Watch what happens on instance C that also allows downvotes.

  1. Before the vote this is what users from each instance see (upvote - downvote = total score)
    A: 10 - 0 = 10
    B: 10 - 0 = 10
    C: 10 - 0 = 10

  2. Now we upvote the post:
    A: 11 - 0 = 11
    B: 11 - 0 = 11
    C: 11 - 0 = 11

  3. We misclicked, we meant to downvote the post:
    A: 10 - 1 = 9
    B: 11 - 0 = 11
    C: 11 - 0 = 11

If the post was hosted on an instance that allowed downvotes users from instance C would see a total score of 9.

load all comments
thecam 134 points 3 years ago

It does. I will never use an instance without downvotes. Nobody liked it when youtube downvotes were hidden.

path: 0 2229290, hotness: undefined, score: 134, children: 10
remotelove 24 points 3 years ago

I think there should be an option (unless there is) for mods to turn off (or hide) voting as needed. That might be an effective way to cancel any downvote brigades. Lemmy really doesn't have the population for mass vote manipulation now, but it will soon enough.

Hiding all votes can also help mitigate some superficial bias, but not all. I believe that if a person sees a comment with a few dozen downvotes first, they tend not to read the post objectively. After being on Reddit for such a long time (12 years or so), I found that it was super easy to manipulate voting trends if I caught a post or comment at just the right time.

Hiding only downvotes is just silly though. Some register of public opinion, positive or negative, still has its uses, IMHO.

path: 0 2229290 2231355, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 1
thecam 9 points 3 years ago

I dont see any issue with the user choosing weather upvotes or downvotes are visible or not. Not in favor of moderators or admins having a choice on this matter.

path: 0 2229290 2231355 2241106, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
fmstrat 12 points 3 years ago

I left lemmy.one because of this.

path: 0 2229290 2235329, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
pewgar_seemsimandroid 1 point 3 years ago

yes

path: 0 2229290 2411260, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
CookieJarObserver 0 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2229290 2243866, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
ttmrichter -34 points 3 years ago

I loved it when Youtube downvotes were hidden.

Next on the chopping block: upvotes.

path: 0 2229290 2231336, hotness: undefined, score: -34, children: 4
axsyse 8 points 3 years ago path: 0 2229290 2231336 2233582, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 3
fediverse
fediverse

@lemmy.world

login for more options
44433
3390
5312

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

  • Posts must be on topic.
  • Be respectful of others.
  • Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
  • Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

go to feed...