Apple Vision Pro sounds less appealing after prescription insert price rumour

3 years ago by realitista to c/applevision

If you thought the headset was expensive, wait until you read this

ahbi_santini 1 point 3 years ago

path: 0 344032, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3

themz 2 points 3 years ago

Because I never ever wear contacts. Just not my thing.

I was actually pondering this; your fake face via EyeSight certainly won't support glasses, but I always wear glasses. That alone will make me look weird!

save

path: 0 344032 344469, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1

derelict 1 point 3 years ago

Is there any reason they couldn't superimpose glasses on your face? I thought filters like adding glasses are a pretty solved problem.

save

path: 0 344032 344469 465950, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

realitista 1 point 3 years ago

Personally I started as farsighted and ended up with bifocals after a while. Contacts would not really solve my problems, and I'm not sure I would want them just for this device. To compare, I paid $100 for lens inserts for my psvr2.

save

path: 0 344032 344459, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

applevision

@lemmy.world

A discussion space for the upcoming Apple Vision Pro headset and VisionOS platform. Buckle up those wallets ladies and gentlemen.

go to feed...

applevision

@lemmy.world

A discussion space for the upcoming Apple Vision Pro headset and VisionOS platform. Buckle up those wallets ladies and gentlemen.

go to feed...