Supreme Court to decide whether ISPs must disconnect users accused of piracy

a year ago by Tony Bark to c/technology

Sony victory in Cox piracy case could be overturned by Supreme Court.
load all comments
PanaX 271 points a year ago

Based on that logic, ammunition and arms manufacturers should be held liable for damages as well.

path: 0 17978778, hotness: undefined, score: 271, children: 9
compostgoblin 162 points a year ago

Yes, but that would mean that logic has any bearing on what the Supreme Court decides to do

path: 0 17978778 17979680, hotness: undefined, score: 162, children: 2
huquad 50 points a year ago

I hate that you're absolutely correct

path: 0 17978778 17979680 17981535, hotness: undefined, score: 50, children: 1
ryper 34 points a year ago

The US has a law to limit the liability of gun manufacturers.

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a U.S law, passed in 2005, that protects firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. Both arms manufacturers and dealers can still be held liable for damages resulting from defective products, breach of contract, criminal misconduct, and other actions for which they are directly responsible. However, they may be held liable for negligent entrustment if it is found that they had reason to believe a firearm was intended for use in a crime.

path: 0 17978778 17980308, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 1
Luffy879 15 points a year ago

Because of fucking course there is

Were talking about Jesusland after all

path: 0 17978778 17980308 17986688, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
masterofn001 22 points a year ago

More like, if you steal something you are banned from using roads and sidewalks and doors.

path: 0 17978778 17980521, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 3
NauticalNoodle 12 points a year ago

Yeah, sure but to "steal something" is to imply that you're depriving the original owner use of the thing you stole. This is more like making an exact copy depriving nobody of use of the original thing.

it's more like depriving someone use of roads, sidewalks, and doors because they got caught walking out of Kinkos

path: 0 17978778 17980521 17984786, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
yggstyle 3 points a year ago

Gonna be a lot of issues that come from this. Legally speaking. It's already on the books that an IP address doesn't represent a single person... so I'm not terribly clear on how they plan to enforce this even if it were to pass.

path: 0 17978778 17980521 17999226, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
88759
22226
14620

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...