that sucks

a year ago by Hofmaimaier to c/politicalhumor

load all comments
Asswardbackaddict 18 points a year ago

I've been charting "The Establishment", mapping out players, structure, hierarchy, methods, key dates, anything else I can, like property assets and visitors. The Epstein files are a key weakness, as are the unredacted flight logs. They are the most revealing look we have at the organization itself. In fact, the "Social" branch in which Epstein and Maxwell were key players, represents the intersection of all the other parts (5 parts, including military-industrial-intelligence and finance). Radical exposure here could be the crack in the door to the whole operation. Israel and our special relationship is the key to the engine room of the criminal enterprise we only loosely know as The Establishment. It's a giant interdependent network of corruption, but laying it all out, there's probably less than 100 people to put pressure on. I think a multi-prong attack combining radical exposure, targeted RICO lawsuits, and funding challengers is the plan to go with. The goal is the severance of the "special relationship" with Israel. It'd be really nice if we could just use direct democracy to say, "no, I would not much like to fund genocide, thank you." It seems like the tables are tilted, but they're really not. Maintaining the secretive infrastructure is expensive, as are any leaks in exposure. These people have names, and though I can't seem to penetrate the intelligence wing of this operation (Epstein and Maxwell are already exposed), we know who can. I say it's time to waterboard everyone even loosely tied to this thing, but we do a lot of people with may more resources than me going at this in smart "civil" ways.

path: 0 18599323, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 4
belastend 10 points a year ago

Looking forward to your article/video/post about it.

It's either going to be illuminating or the funniest schizo post that week

path: 0 18599323 18600217, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
Asswardbackaddict 7 points a year ago

Can't it be both?

path: 0 18599323 18600217 18600282, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Serinus 3 points a year ago

It seems about 70/30 the wrong way right now. But there are key points I like.

Less than 100 people with outsized influence sounds like it could be true.

path: 0 18599323 18600217 18606231, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
brown567 4 points a year ago

Thanks for doing the stringboarding that I'm not brave enough to do, you're fighting the good fight

path: 0 18599323 18600009, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
politicalhumor
politicalhumor

@lemmy.world

login for more options
2129
665
544

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

  • Be excellent to each other.
  • No harassment.
  • No sexism, racism or bigotry.
  • All arguments should be made in good faith.
  • No misinformation. Be prepared to back up your factual claims with evidence.
  • All posts should relate to politics and be of a humorous nature.
  • No bots, spam or self-promotion.
  • If you want to run a bot, ask first.
  • Site wide rules apply.
  • Have fun.

go to feed...