Leebra
login register
That post seems to be missing.
load all comments
bestnerd 40 points 3 years ago

But he’s over it, so they should drop it. When I’m over a lawsuit the prosecutor usually drops it as well. It’s in the constitution article under the “I’m over it and it’s hurting my campaign” clause

save

path: 0 2668278, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 2
squiblet 14 points 3 years ago

Hey, I was just publicly attacking your giant corporation with publicity and regulatory action to benefit my political campaign. It didn’t work, so, you guys are cool, right?

save

path: 0 2668278 2668417, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
NABDad 5 points 3 years ago

Hey, I was just publicly attacking your giant corporation**'s fundamental Constitutional rights** with publicity and regulatory action to benefit my political campaign. It didn’t work, so, you guys are cool, right?

FTFY. If he was just attacking a corporation, no one would care. What he's doing is wiping his ass with the Constitution.

If they passed these laws affecting Disney at any other time, without Governor Dipshitis making comments to make it specifically clear that he was punishing Disney for their criticism, Disney would have a tougher time fighting back. Making it specifically an attack on free speech rights was an incredibly short-sighted move.

The article said he was incapable of seeing more than a few moves ahead. I'd argue that he was incapable of seeing one move ahead.

save

path: 0 2668278 2668417 2673963, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...