U.S. ambassador to Japan will publicly eat Fukushima fish amid radioactive water release outrage

3 years ago by alphacyberranger to c/world

He said it was intended to be a “show of solidarity.”
load all comments
beltsin 164 points 3 years ago

The level of ignorance around any nuclear related incident is astounding

path: 0 2788863, hotness: undefined, score: 164, children: 44
dan1101 76 points 3 years ago

If the radiation levels are truly negligible then the media shares blame for getting people upset over it.

path: 0 2788863 2790150, hotness: undefined, score: 76, children: 29
chaogomu 84 points 3 years ago

Oil companies are ultimately to blame. After all, it was the Rockefeller Foundation who did the early radiation studies in the 50s, and then blatantly lied about the results to make radiation sound super scary. They claimed that there was no safe dose of radiation, and that any exposure, no matter how small, led to a direct, linear, increase in cancer risk.

And then the oil companies funded politicians who declared education to be the enemy, so now Americans don't know enough physics to know that every day, they are swimming in safe doses of ionizing radiation. That ocean water has millions of tons of natural uranium oxide dissolved in it.

US nuclear policy has been based off of these lies, it's part of why nuclear power is so expensive.

Those same oil companies actually paid to found Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth to specifically advocate against nuclear power, by spreading fear and lies about how nuclear physics work.

The Rockefeller foundation still funds Greenpeace, and still requires that Greenpeace be anti-nuclear to receive that funding. All while being heavily invested in oil.

path: 0 2788863 2790150 2791228, hotness: undefined, score: 84, children: 28
scarabic 9 points 3 years ago

Truly. The evacuation order itself killed more people around Fukushima than radiation did.

path: 0 2788863 2828443, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 4
natryamar 2 points 3 years ago

I want to know more about this do you have an article you recommend?

path: 0 2788863 2828443 2851931, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
roguetrick 6 points 3 years ago

It's reasonable to be concerned about the long term health effects of tritiated water. It's very unlikely this will have any effects though. It's only like a few grams. I bet fusion power would produce a whole lot more, even through the blanket. That could have considerable local health effects.

path: 0 2788863 2796013, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
clutchmatic 6 points 3 years ago

Also, no news piece ever mentioned how far from the coast Japan is planning to release that water

path: 0 2788863 2815929, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
Filipdaflippa 3 points 3 years ago

Why would that matter, do living things cease to exist once you get farther from the coast?

path: 0 2788863 2815929 2820555, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
cloud 4 points 3 years ago

Yes, the ignorance is mainly caused by governments and lobbies keeping quiet about what actually happened and washing down data

path: 0 2788863 2796643, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
hotdaniel 21 points 3 years ago

More like, ignorance caused by my local news deciding to run a story telling people there is a controversy, without making a simple statement like the water is less radioactive than a banana. There's a controversy in part because the media encourages it, at almost every opportunity.

path: 0 2788863 2796643 2800326, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 1
roguetrick 6 points 3 years ago

Most folks, including nuclear advocates, have little understanding of either fission products or neutron activation. They really have no need to. I don't think the data isn't there if you look for it though. It's just not simple to understand.

path: 0 2788863 2796643 2796825, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
world
world

@lemmy.world

login for more options
58462
34841
9153

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/...

  • Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

go to feed...