Choosing between a full-time APRS or packet station?

3 years ago by minorsecond to c/hamradio

I love playing with packet, and I love playing with APRS. So how do I decide?

There’s quite a bit of both packet and APRS activity in the area. I don’t want to put up another antenna at the moment because funds won’t allow, otherwise I’d get another cheap 2m rig for APRS.

On packet, I occasionally check in with other hams and send messages. I mostly keep it running because my webmap at packetradiomap.com uses my radio to map locally received stations. I could modify the webmap to not use my radio though.

I feel running an APRS station is more “useful” though, as my area isn’t covered very well by iGates or digipeaters.

So if you had to choose, would you go full time APRS or packet?

load all comments

UnexampledSalt 4 points 3 years ago

I would personally go for packet because it fits my preferences. Im not really looking for location tracking or iGates. I'm wanting a dedicated message system. Packet would be my choice for that.

save

path: 0 51374, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1

minorsecond 2 points 3 years ago

That's kind of what I'm leaning toward. The only real reason I'm considering APRS is because my FT-5D can't hit any iGates or digipeaters when I'm around my house. But do I really need APRS when I'm at home? I don't think so.

save

path: 0 51374 51439, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0