Instagram boss: 16 hours of daily use is not addiction

6 months ago by excel24 to c/technology

Instagram's Adam Mosseri faced questioning about the impact of his platform on minors.
load all comments
Analog 82 points 6 months ago

Post headline deserves a downvote. Quote from article:

Lanier asked Mosseri what he thought of K.G.M's longest single day of use of Instagram being 16 hours.

"That sounds like problematic use," the Instagram boss answered. He did not call it an addiction.

He also didn’t say it was a tomato. Like wtf do you want, I can’t tell if he was asked specifically if 16 hours a day was an addiction. The prior question was about whether he had known she had a 16hr day, and he had not. (He should have; poor trial prep.)

This is sensationalist BS and I dearly want this platform to be better than that.

Just so we’re clear, Meta can die in a fire and the world would be better off, I’m not defending them in the slightest.

path: 0 22190067, hotness: undefined, score: 82, children: 87
XLE 91 points 6 months ago

The title is accurate.

He was asked if it was an addiction, and he repeatedly used technicalities and weaseley language to refuse to admit it.

"It's important to differentiate between clinical addiction and problematic use," [Instagram head Adam Mosseri] added.

"I'm sure I've said that I've been addicted to a Netflix show when I binged it really late one night, but I don't think it's the same thing as clinical addiction."

Yet, Mosseri repeatedly said he was not an expert in addiction in response to Lanier's questioning.

path: 0 22190067 22191312, hotness: undefined, score: 91, children: 30
lmmarsano 0 points 6 months ago

he repeatedly used technicalities and weaseley language to refuse to admit it

see

Yet, Mosseri repeatedly said he was not an expert in addiction in response to Lanier’s questioning.

Even if a nonexpert claims something is clinical addiction, they're a nonexpert & their word is meaningless. For a credible statement, they'll need to admit relevant evidence instead of ask a nonexpert.

Imagine being asked for a medical diagnosis when you're not a qualified physician. It's perfectly fair to point out you're not an expert on the matter & point out your awareness of distinctions between imprecise conventional language & precise, scientific definitions.

No one is obligated to volunteer dubious claims to antagonize themselves on the stand just because you want them to.

path: 0 22190067 22191312 22199872, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
maturelemontree -1 points 6 months ago

That still sounds misleading. He was not speaking for 16 hours of use which is what the headline suggests. As other has stated, I hope those companies crumble but I think honesty is important, not sensationalization.

path: 0 22190067 22191312 22193548, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 2
lastlybutfirstly -1 points 6 months ago

He's right. Clinical addiction has nothing to do with how much you do something, it has to do with how much it causes problems in your life. I know everyone on Lemmy is tripping over their own hard ons to kill corporations, but there are people using lemmy 16 hours a day and if laws are passed to fight Internet addiction, they will not specifically target corporations. We all go down together. Just ask the creator of Urban Dead.

path: 0 22190067 22191312 22204430, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 24
Doomsider 37 points 6 months ago

The entire line of questioning was about addiction and the CEO was pretending it wasn't (he didn't want up admit the truth because his company would be liable). The headline was accurate and your take is officially a hot one.

path: 0 22190067 22190632, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 0
artyom 9 points 6 months ago

Something something defending the billionaires! /s

path: 0 22190067 22190326, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 52
Analog -6 points 6 months ago

I just dislike sensationalism.

If the truth isn’t enough, then I don’t want it.

path: 0 22190067 22190326 22190442, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 51
luciferofastora 0 points 6 months ago

The post accurately copies the article's headline without editorialising.

The article itself is shit though.

path: 0 22190067 22192979, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
lmmarsano -1 points 6 months ago

This is sensationalist BS and I dearly want this platform to be better than that.

This platform loves sensationalism. Same with other platforms.

path: 0 22190067 22199347, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
87434
21307
15949

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...