msspwn 6 points 8 months ago

Extreamly cool. But why tor and not i2p? Could using a non tor framework also work?(perhaps ssh tunnels)

path: 0 22300167, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 7

hereforawhile 9 points 8 months ago

With some work we should theoretically be able to configure any networking pipe. I like Tor for it's large distributed userbase/built in plug and play circumship transports and reliability is the short answer. It passes simple text encoded audio which should make it really easy to plug n play other networks. Also, I'm using open SSL as an additional encryption layer, it should be possible to configure any other encryption primatives you want easily. It doesn't have to use this library. It's just the one I chose.

save

path: 0 22300167 22300304, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3

digitalFatteh 2 points 8 months ago

Is there a limit to the size of what could be sent or could someone maliciously record something capable of grinding the system to a halt ?

save

path: 0 22300167 22300304 22300417, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2

phase 1 point 8 months ago

It's socat. It could be whatever stdin/out (socat, netcat, ssh, ip, ipsec, wireguard, ...).

save

path: 0 22300167 22304104, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

quick_snail 1 point 8 months ago

I'm glad you chose Tor and not i2p.

save

path: 0 22300167 22303456, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1

chortle_tortle 2 points 8 months ago

What are your takes on the two, and why do you prefer Tor?

save

path: 0 22300167 22303456 22304566, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0