How would you answer the "ecological" question on self hosting and federated networks ?

7 months ago by OctoLumia to c/selfhosting

Recently, I was chatting with a friend, and we were talking about ‘de-Googling’, federated networks and self-hosted services. As I was listing the benefits and my largely positive experience with them (the Fediverse for the most part), my friend pointed out that it isn’t an environmentally friendly solution, nor is it optimised for the long term. He told me that it requires more machines that consume more energy than a single large one, as these machines aren’t specialised for hosting services. What’s your view on the argument that ‘several small machines that consume more energy are less optimised and eco-friendly than a single large one built and designed for that purpose’? I realise that the large machine goes hand in hand with techno-fascists and that they are the real problem, but what if we were to look at this from a purely technical, forward-looking perspective on a clean future? How would you respond to this ?

load all comments
jamescroll -5 points 6 months ago

Well if you have a small enough server, couldn't it be powered by solar?

path: 0 23322779, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 1
OctoLumia 1 point 6 months ago

actually, haven't thought to say that when I was in the discution, but that's a neat argument/solution

path: 0 23322779 23331498, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
selfhosting
selfhosting

@slrpnk.net

login for more options
4698
381
285

Hosting your own services. Preferably at home and on low-power or shared hardware.

Please don't share vibe coded projects here.

Also check out:

go to feed...