Los Angeles police fatally shoot pet dog of family celebrating Knicks win

6 days ago by Valuy to c/news

Video taken after the shooting shows a woman sobbing over the pet with nearly a dozen officers standing around
load all comments
Zaktor 33 points 6 days ago

If you're scared of dogs you simply shouldn't be allowed to be a police officer. Dogs can be dangerous, but a dog running at someone is a very normal thing dogs do and you need to be able to fucking handle that before you enter someone's property with a gun.

path: 0 24296480, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 19
ohulancutash -57 points 6 days ago

Or dog owners could simply keep their animals under control. Other people don’t particularly want to be approached by canines of unknown provenance.

path: 0 24296480 24296637, hotness: undefined, score: -57, children: 18
Zaktor 42 points 6 days ago

If you're entering someone's property without their express consent, you're not being "approached" by a dog. If it's literally your job to do that, you need to be able to react reasonably to dogs who will act like dogs.

Just don't become a cop, then you can complain about dogs approaching you all you want.

path: 0 24296480 24296637 24296799, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 13
SalmiakDragon -3 points 6 days ago

I read the article with Firefox Reader Mode. Here's how the cops describe the incident:

In a statement, the LAPD said its officers were directed to an apartment by a person who called them to report screaming, and when the woman opened the door they were confronted by a large, barking dog.

“The officers asked her to secure the dog, and the resident closed her door momentarily,” the statement said.

“She reopened the door, and the dog exited the apartment. Once outside of the apartment, the dog charged at one of the officers, resulting in an Officer-Involved Shooting (OIS).”

It might be bullshit ofc, but I think this qualifies as "being approached" by a dog. It's a dog owner's responsibility to secure their dog, especially after being asked to.

path: 0 24296480 24296637 24296799 24300325, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 12
ExLisper 16 points 6 days ago

Shooting at dogs is incredibly stupid. I've seen video where cop shoots at a dog, the bullet hits concrete floor and pieces of concrete hits a child in the face. I've also seen a video where a cop shoots a child behind the dog. The dog will not kill the cop but he is creating life threatening situation to everyone around. Shooting at a dog is not an appropriate defense, It should be a fireable offense.

path: 0 24296480 24296637 24296799 24300325 24300609, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 8
Lucidlethargy 8 points 5 days ago

Was the dog actually attacking them, though?

This is the question.

path: 0 24296480 24296637 24296799 24300325 24304046, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
BillCheddar 1 point 5 days ago

Wait until you see a picture of how small the dog is. That lil guy isn't charging at anyone.

path: 0 24296480 24296637 24296799 24300325 24308206, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
38073
38649
9388

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...