Google has started encrypting its search results' URLs with "goto?=" links for logged out sessions and/or scrapers ( 28 August, 2026 )

a month ago by onionsinmypores to c/technology

Google now hides the destination URL on every search result behind an encrypted blob. I took the encryption apart, and I can still read every ranked URL off the page in one pass.

About a week or two ago, I started noticing that I could no longer copy the clean links for search result hits on Google. I thought it was maybe some quirk of a browser I was using, but today when trying to copy a link to a Youtube video, I realized it was actually rolled out globally (it seems).

Basically instead of getting a
https://youtube/. com/watch?v=-ed6UeDp1ek link now through google, (spaced out link to avoid AutoMod) you will get
https://www.google.com/goto?url=CAES<rest-of-encrypted-blob-containing--versionByte-keyID-cipherText>

The article describes the change in technical detail, and mentions a fix, but the author has kept it private for now so Google doesn't patch it up (like they probably will or have for this workaround relying on the "Translate Page" feature with a different Browser Language selection [Twitter Link, Aug 27]).

Why it will probably be patched:

Surprised there's no post about it here already.
Only Hackernews article I could find (4 days ago):
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49506338

Edit: It seems to matter a lot whether your network is deemed "spammy" or problematic by Google for the encrypted URLs to kick in, even if you're logged out. Funnily enough my google searches went back to normal a few hours after I posted this. So a logged out session might get the regular, unencrypted links if your IP network has a good rating on Google's end. Mine often runs into captchas and the like, so it makes sense why I'd be targeted by this new change.
Then again, I just tested on my mobile cellular on a logged out search, and I still have the goto's. Can't really control that.

load all comments
chunes 67 points a month ago

So google has no problems unleashing their bots on others but they don't want to get scraped themselves?

That's the sort of shit that should get your company disbanded in any functioning civilization.

path: 0 25664129, hotness: undefined, score: 67, children: 8
MadBits 14 points a month ago

That's why everyone should try and avoid google and use some alternatives.

path: 0 25664129 25665508, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 6
BilSabab 10 points a month ago

DuckDuck is literally right here.

path: 0 25664129 25665508 25665956, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 5
MadBits 9 points a month ago

Qwant, SwissCow, DuckDuckGo and many others.

path: 0 25664129 25665508 25665956 25666235, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Randelung 3 points a month ago

And it'll even sometimes show relevant results!

Seriously though, noai.ddg is my default, but I still have to switch to google way too often.

path: 0 25664129 25665508 25665956 25666178, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
88745
22215
14627

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...