electrolysis day

23 days ago by applebusch (she/her) to c/trans_joy

just casually killing some hairs on a lazy sunday night

load all comments
cheeseandkrakens 15 points 23 days ago

Professional electrologist here. From this picture, your insertion looks way too deep. Unless you're using half length probes?

Personally, i would never recommend doing insertions on your own face. But I also understand how prohibitively expensive professional services can be, if they are available in your area at all.

If you haven't already, do a depth test on a hair: Pluck a hair, placing the tweezers as close to the skin as possible, and then compare the amount of hair below the skin to the length of the probe. Your insertion should be ever so slightly shallower than the depth of the hair. If your skin is dimpling when you insert the probe, you're doing it wrong. Either bad angle or bad depth.

path: 0 25933052, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 6
applebusch 9 points 23 days ago

everyones a critic... my probes are short and my hairs are very deep. believe it or not i do know what im doing.

path: 0 25933052 25933238, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
tanisnikana 21 points 23 days ago

They’re just trying to look out for you.

It’s best to believe in the human good; otherwise, the world is a miserable and irredeemable place.

path: 0 25933052 25933238 25936096, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
cheeseandkrakens 20 points 23 days ago

Just trying to help my community, friend. No need to get defensive.

FYI, that is a standard length probe, not short. I'm struggling to find a good picture of the short probes, but the insertable length is about half that of your probes. They're pretty uncommon. Ballet only makes them in size 2 (for those unfamiliar with electrolysis probes, size refers to the diameter of the insertable portion of the probe).

So I still suspect you're going deeper than necessary. I've never had a client where I needed to bottom out a probe on the upper lip like that. On the neck I might. But I am not saying you won't get extractions like this. Galvanic is the most forgiving on depth of the 3 modalities, since the lye will flow to the target area anyway. But you are at less risk of puncturing the bottom of the follicle if you go a little shallow vs a little deep.

path: 0 25933052 25933238 25937611, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0
beyoublahaj 4 points 23 days ago

Hi professional electrologist, what do you think of this?

path: 0 25933052 25935719, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
cheeseandkrakens 5 points 23 days ago

That's wild, but also very impressive that she was able to build it! The nice thing about galvanic electrolysis is that it uses a very low power (my work machine doesn't go above 1mA DC), which means you aren't likely to majorly hurt yourself. Scarring is still possible with poor technique. My only question is how do we verify that the machine is outputting the energy it says it is? Truth be told, this is something I wonder even with professional machines.

The video where she demonstrated removing a hair made me SCREAM! Your skin should not be dimpling like that when you insert the probe if you're doing it correctly. If this were a professional electrologist, I would report them to the state board if there is one. It takes a lot of stretching of the skin to do a proper insertion. You wouldn't try to put your sock on your feet without holding the sock with your hands, would you? Same concept. Hair follicles aren't rigid tubes, they're like a deflated balloon. Our skin is stretchy and we need to eliminate that variable to get our straight probe inserted without puncturing the walls of the follicle. It also looked like the hair wasn't fully treated by the way it resisted being pulled out. A properly treated hair will slide out without resistance.

Like I said, I would not recommend self-insertions if you can avoid it. Finding the right insertion angle is so much harder when you can't adjust your viewing angle, and getting the right stretch on the skin is so very important.

Side note, I think her units of lye calculation is actually for blend, not galvanic. The heat from the HF current in blend increases production of lye by something like 4-7x. I'm gonna need to find my old textbook to verify, but generally speaking, galvanic treatment times typically range from 20sec to 3min per hair.

path: 0 25933052 25935719 25938146, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
DaPorkchop_ 3 points 23 days ago

oh wow that's cool, i've been following this one (alt link) but updates have been very slow. the one you linked looks pretty much production-ready, i might have to try building it soon...

path: 0 25933052 25935719 25938201, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
trans_joy
trans_joy

@lemmy.blahaj.zone

login for more options
996
489
1523

the place to post trans joy!

selfies, nudes, other stuff, whateversies really. if it gives you gender euphoria or brings you joy or anything like that it can go here!

needless to say, bigots will be yeeted on sight

go to feed...