Police Spent £320k on Face ID Tech That Achieved Nothing

3 days ago by Armand1 to c/unitedkingdom

British Transport Police (BTP) have spent more than £320k and almost 100 hours of officers’ time on a six-month trial of live facial recognition (LFR) technology in London’s railway stations – yielding just one incorrect face match and no arrests.

The surveillance tech scans passersby and alerts authorities if it recognises someone on a watchlist. It is supposed to help catch people accused of crimes or who breach court orders.

But a freedom of information request by Liberty Investigates, shared with the Guardian in September, revealed that after scanning more than half a million faces between February and July, the tech only sent one suspect alert, and that turned out to be a false positive.

Despite this failure, Transport for London (TfL) has given permission for the technology to be expanded across London Underground stations too.

Well, at least there aren't dozens of false positives and people getting arrested or shot, like with Flock in America.

load all comments
whatthey 1 point 15 hours ago

Despite this failure, Transport for London (TfL) has given permission for the technology to be expanded across London Underground stations too.

That's the bit that gets me.

It failed miserably and yet they still think doubling down will make it successful. Stop believing the hype!!

Cut your losses on the 320K, consider it an unsuccessful trial and move on.

Also, 100 hours is like 2 offices working for a week, so it really isn't terrible in terms of man hours.

path: 0 26285952, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
unitedkingdom
unitedkingdom

@feddit.uk

login for more options
6967
7413
3138

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

go to feed...