YouTube suspends Russell Brand from making money off his channel — The suspension comes following the publication of rape and sexual assault allegations against the British star

3 years ago by L4sBot to c/technology

The BBC also pulled some of the British star's shows from its streaming services following rape and sexual assault allegations against the comedian, who has developed into a "wellness" and conspiracy influencer.

YouTube suspends Russell Brand from making money off his channel — The suspension comes following the publication of rape and sexual assault allegations against the British star::YouTube has blocked Russell Brand from making money off its platform and the BBC pulled some of his shows from its online streaming service in the wake of rape and sexual assault allegations against the comedian-turned-influencer.

load all comments
sentient_loom 156 points 3 years ago

I have no reason to doubt the allegations. But allegations shouldn't be enough for somebody to lose their livelihood.

path: 0 3590828, hotness: undefined, score: 156, children: 28
treefrog 86 points 3 years ago
path: 0 3590828 3591816, hotness: undefined, score: 86, children: 4
Honytawk -5 points 3 years ago

Do you know any corporation that would?

path: 0 3590828 3591816 3618847, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 3
LarryTheMatador 63 points 3 years ago
path: 0 3590828 3593038, hotness: undefined, score: 63, children: 11
phillaholic 5 points 3 years ago

Has he been banned from using the Internet? No? Then you’re spewing bullshit. YouTube doesn’t have to host his content and advertisers don’t need to pay him for it. He isn’t entitled to shit. He can fuck off to some right-wing hellscape of a site that will platform him. That’s capitalism baby!

path: 0 3590828 3593038 3611253, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
FaeDrifter 2 points 3 years ago

FYI, even if ISP's were absorbed the the government and made into a utility as you suggest, Google would still own YouTube and still be able to demonetize whoever it wants.

I'm not sure why this thread is such a swarm of brainless zero IQ takes.

path: 0 3590828 3593038 3612060, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
reagansrottencorpse -4 points 3 years ago

Get out of here with your critical thinking!!!

Shakes fist

path: 0 3590828 3593038 3594909, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 2
thecrotch -12 points 3 years ago
path: 0 3590828 3593038 3595570, hotness: undefined, score: -12, children: 5
RobotToaster 15 points 3 years ago

For 700 years one of the central principles of British law has been that someone shouldn't be punished without being brought in Answer by due Process of the Law.

It's scary how many people are willing to throw that out the window and behave like medieval peasants lynching witches.

path: 0 3590828 3596862, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 3
sentient_loom 8 points 3 years ago

Yep. I understand that it's hard to prosecute rape, but without rule of law we're fucked.

path: 0 3590828 3596862 3597600, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
WorldWideLem 1 point 3 years ago

This principle exists to shield the people from their government. It is not intended to be (and has never been) a protection for someone's social status or reputation.

path: 0 3590828 3596862 3613056, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
NuPNuA -1 points 3 years ago

Who's throwing him in prison? He's isn't facing any legal consequences as a result of this news. He's facing social consequences from organisations that no longer want to be associated with him. He's free to being a libel case in the UK if he wants to clear his name, but instead he put up a video claiming "they're" out to get him.

path: 0 3590828 3596862 3618864, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
WorldWideLem 12 points 3 years ago

I don't think it's that simple. Heinous allegations can make that business relationship untenable. YouTube has an image to protect as well as other partnerships to maintain. There are people (not just wealthy executives) whose livelihood relies on those things,.

If a person's reputation, fair or not, creates a risk to those things, why should YouTube be forced to assume that risk on their behalf?

path: 0 3590828 3611775, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 2
Slotos 4 points 3 years ago

Bullshit. If they wanted to cut ties and protect their image, they could block the channel and wash their hands.

This here is pure profiteering.

path: 0 3590828 3611775 3616703, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
NuPNuA 3 points 3 years ago

No one should see YT as a "livelyhood" as no one has a contract with them guaranteing income.

path: 0 3590828 3618818, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
sentient_loom 0 points 3 years ago

YouTube is big business. Of course content makers should be able to rely on it for livelihood.

path: 0 3590828 3618818 3625983, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
OscarRobin 1 point 3 years ago

I agree to an extent, however the reason behind Google cancelling his ads is almost certainly not because Google doesn't want to monetize as much content as humanly possible, but because they expect or know that their advertisers don't want their ads next to an alleged (and possibly convicted in the future) rapist / sexual predator.

path: 0 3590828 3618966, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Clbull -1 points 3 years ago

Google used to be incredibly hands-off about these things, only terminating someone if they were actually convicted in a court of law.

Compare the cases of Austin Jones (who didn't have his YouTube channel terminated until he was actually convicted of distributing child porn and sentenced to ten years in prison) and EDP445 (who was caught in a pedophile hunter sting operation and was immediately terminated from all social media.)

path: 0 3590828 3628662, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
85657
20002
16397

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...