US's Blinken says no to any Ukraine peace deal that doesn't include total Russian withdrawal

3 years ago by BrooklynMan to c/worldnews

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken says the United States and its allies should not support a cease-fire or peace talks to end the war in Ukraine until Kyiv gains strength and can negotiate on its own terms. Blinken said in Finland on Friday that heeding calls from Russia and others for negotiations now would result in a false “Potemkin peace” that wouldn’t secure Ukraine’s sovereignty and or enhance European security. He argued that a cease-fire allowing Russian President Vladimir Putin “to consolidate control over the territory he has seized, and rest, rearm, and re-attack" would not bring "a just and lasting peace.” Kyiv has given confusing signals about whether a counteroffensive is coming or already underway.

“We believe the prerequisite for meaningful diplomacy and real peace is a stronger Ukraine, capable of deterring and defending against any future aggression,” Blinken said in a speech in Finland, which recently became NATO’s newest member and shares a long border with Russia.

load all comments

calcifer 2 points 3 years ago

Bunch of people keep talking about how the US shouldn't broker peace deals and China should. Hypocrisy at its finest.

The fact is, having a third party nation recommendation for peace or no peace is a standard for centuries, and if that nation is a global hegemony with nuclear weapons, then it makes sense.

save

path: 0 591, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 11

Tretiak 1 point 3 years ago

Bunch of people keep talking about how the US shouldn’t broker peace deals and China should. Hypocrisy at its finest.

Would you have North Korea brokering deals between Thailand and Laos?

save

path: 0 591 1289, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1

calcifer 2 points 3 years ago

If they actually had any influence instead of being a laughing stock, then it would be the norm, yes. They don't though, but China could and would be the better example instead of a Red herring. Or Australia (they don't have nukes, but similar influence and such).

save

path: 0 591 1289 1290, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

X77 -1 points 3 years ago

People want the war could end, but US won't let it. What hypocrisy?

save

path: 0 591 721, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 6

Cromutorium 5 points 3 years ago

people want the war to end

Russia clearly doesn't. In fact they were the ones who started it

save

path: 0 591 721 1177, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4

Tretiak 3 points 3 years ago

People refuse to hold their own side accountable and recognize what their contribution to the problem is.

save

path: 0 591 721 1240, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

comfy -3 points 3 years ago

The US is one of the least peaceful states in the world, and that's no easy feat. Plus, they are openly involved in the proxy war, as opposed to China.

I'm not seeing the hypocrisy here.

save

path: 0 591 1471, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 1

Tretiak 2 points 3 years ago

You’re arguing against a position that’s every bit as dumb and I’ll-informed, as the chick that heads up the NED, attempting to overthrow regimes opposed to the US all over the world. The people replying to you in ignorance aren’t in need of a ‘debate’, but an education.

save

path: 0 591 1471 2926, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

Rules:

Rules: