Supreme Court Backs Web Designer Opposed to Same-Sex Marriage

3 years ago by BraveSirZaphod to c/politics

The decision appeared to suggest that the rights of L.G.B.T.Q. people, including to same-sex marriage, are on more vulnerable legal footing, particularly when they are at odds with claims of religious freedom.

The justices settled a question left open in 2018: whether businesses open to the public and engaged in expression may refuse to serve customers based on religious convictions.

load all comments
DiachronicShear 9 points 3 years ago

So it's now legal to have a "WHITES ONLY" or a "STRAIGHTS ONLY" sign on your door?

path: 0 663867, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 4
BraveSirZaphod 1 point 3 years ago

I don't love this ruling, but that's very much not what it's saying, no. The fundamental point is that businesses that are substantially creative in nature cannot be compelled to produce speech they strongly disagree with. The case was litigates as a free speech case, not a civil rights one.

It's important to note that this was examining a state law, so it does depend on the state, but in Colorado for instance, a bar could still absolutely not have a "No Blacks" sign. However, a racist graphic designer could refuse a request to design a logo for a Black Lives Matter group, though they could not necessarily refuse a non-political request from a client that happens to be Black. On the flip side, this ruling also protects a graphic designer from being compelled to produce a Neo-Nazi design, for instance.

path: 0 663867 664425, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
DarkGamer 2 points 3 years ago

On the flip side, this ruling also protects a graphic designer from being compelled to produce a Neo-Nazi design, for instance.

@BraveSirZaphod There's never been any risk of that. Being a Neo-Nazi isn't a protected class. Sexual orientation is.

path: 0 663867 664425 680915, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Generic-Disposable 1 point 3 years ago

It's important to note that this was examining a state law, so it does depend on the state, but in Colorado for instance, a bar could still absolutely not have a "No Blacks" sign.

Why not? Why isn't a sign an expression of free speech?

path: 0 663867 664425 670741, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
politics
politics

@kbin.social

login for more options
1025
967
4

@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.

go to feed...