It's a FromSoft game with souls mechanics. I wouldn't call it a souls-like personally, but it's more of a souls-like than some other games I've seen use that genre name.

I wouldn't say the combat is an important part of the genre though honestly, even though it is one of the most recognizable parts of the games. I'd say the largest pillar is exploration, usually in a world that doesn't feel like it's designed for you. Another big one is, usually, that death isn't a failure. You don't reset and lose progress. Death, in itself, still is progress (but you usually need to collect your currency).

People will usually talk about the combat (which has changed a lot in the genre, so it isn't that important), or the difficulty (honestly, Elden Ring in particular is pretty easy, so I would say it obviously isn't critical). It's all the little things that really create the genre though. I could easily see a walking sim through a mysterious castle being a souls-like with no combat and only puzzles.

Sorry for the rant. Lol. I forgot what this was about for a minute. All of this is to say I could see AC6 being a souls-like, but I don't think it fits perfectly. I wouldn't argue with someone including it though.

With mods, anything is possible. I'm certain you can play as a cute anime girl if you really want to!

As for difficulty, it really isn't that bad. Don't buy the hype. It's only hard if you want it to be. Just don't slam your head into a wall until it breaks. That's not how you're supposed to play. Once you hit a point you struggle with, you're supposed to go level and get new gear. It'll be easier when you come back.

I just don't really care for the way Cononical does things.

Garuda at least was trivial to get going. You install it and it has everything you need, then it also has a tool where you can select any other packages you may want. It's pretty nice. I've heard CachyOS is really easy to get going too. You basically don't need to use the terminal for them if you really don't want to, but it is significantly easier to do a lot of things with it. If you managed to install Fedora, you'll be fine with either of these too. They're no harder than Fedora or Ubuntu except you get the bonus of the Arch Wiki for anything you might need.

That's also assuming a data breach is required for it to be bad. What's to stop them from using this to tie a person to activity? Then it makes it really hard to view things your country/employer/etc might not want you to see, for fear that there will be consequences for it.

If it was just a magical switch, to ban people under a certain age from social media, I'd be for that probably. It isn't though. At best, there are consequences that effect everyone. At worst, this is a backdoor to push through internet tracking legislation.

I don't understand how this justification holds any ground. Civilians, when applying stand your ground doctrine (assuming that applies in this state) can't out themselves in a position of danger and then claim self-defence. How does a cop get to use that excuse. If you stand in front of a car, whatever happens after is your fault. A civilian who pulls a gun a threatens someone, and stands in front of their car, does not have any legal standing to shoot them.

The thing about drugs is, as far as I'm aware, the "hard drug" thing is bullshit, and it's part of the problem. We give drugs to kids all the time, in the form of caffeine. Most people have a caffeine dependance and at least casually use alcohol.

I dislike that we treat some drugs as evil, and others as part of our daily lives. The should all be handled with proper education and care. People should actually be made aware of what addiction feels like, and how to handle it. They should also be informed of what certain drugs feel like and have access to harm reduction techniques if needed.

Drugs aren't evil. They are often dangerous though. They have been a part of human culture for longer than we've been human. We should be free to use them if we choose, and this should be able to be done safely.

Your choice of distro doesn't matter insofar as you can fix any issues you have with one, and it can be modified to work like any other.

Your choice of distro does matter in the fact that your time is limited and you probably don't want to spend days making your system work exactly like you want from a base point that was far away from that. You should choose a distro that minimizes the gap between what you want and what you get out of the box.

You just need to choose one that seems right, then you can make the modifications you need. Just make a choice though. It'll be fine if you just picked something that seems close enough.

The thing with Fedora is they will not ship with anything that isn't FOSS. This means some things will be missing, like video codex as an example. You can add whatever you need to it, but you'll sometimes have a starting point that needs more things added than another distro would. Also, tutorials may not include Fedora directions.

Personally, I've been using Garuda for a few years, and it's been great. I used Fedora for a bit before and ditched it. Garuda is Arch-based, so Arch tutorials directions work, and you get all the benefits of Arch without the work. CachyOS should be similar.

Personally, I don't care for Ubuntu. I used it before Fedora and I preferred Fedora.

Yeah... this didn't age well. How did you end up here 7m later?

The issue isn't resolved because this doesn't actually do anything. It's an issue because it's a ratchet. If we let it proceed, there's almost no way for us to go back.

The engine isn't bad itself. The problem is it has some really cool tools that are expensive to run, but developers just turn them all on instead of optimizing. See: ARC Raiders for how it should be done. It's UE5, but they aren't using Nanite or Lumen. UE5 can run very well. Game developers thinking the only thing that matters is having the most photorealistic games is what's causes the issue.

No, I mean they can give you more information. Shadows can tell you where players are before you can see them, for example. You can also get information from reflections. Players who have hardware that can't support these features are disadvantaged. Lumen is not equivalent to, for example, texture resolution.

The developers can, or they can add a toggle. It isn't fundamental to UE5. ARC Raiders and Squad are both on UE5 and don't use Lumen.

The issue is supporting Lumen and another lighting solution requires them to make sure both work. For multiplayer games especially, having both isn't an option, because then it gives an advantage to some people. Squad, for example, looked into it, but they ended up going with a different GI system that's more performant so everyone can (and must) use it.

For single-player games, it's possible to have Lumen and another option. It's just extra cost to development. They'd rather go with the option that creates better trailers and not worry about people struggling to run it. They can run at an upscale 240p for all the executives care.

What? Which ones? Escape from Tarkov is the most expensive Unity game to run that I know of, and it doesn't have this issue.

The issues with UE5 aren't the base engine. It's Nanite and Lumen, and how easy they make them to just toggle on. Unity doesn't have any features like this. You can get things like them on the store, but they aren't baked in. They do have ECS, which is designed to have a ridiculous number of entities operating at once. I could see how that could cause this issue if unoptimized, but not many games are using it yet so it's not what you're talking about.

There's also the NSA PRISM, which is older than the current LLM garbage. It's just a basic ass name that makes for a good pun on something that changes how you see things.

Yeah, that's almost certainly not because of Unity. At most, it could be blamed on C#, if we're blaming the technology. This is an issue with their simulation I would assume. For example, Timberborn is simulating liquids and a population of workers. The liquids are probably the biggest culprit, and there's a reason you don't see many games doing it.

All the games you listed are simulation games though. They are going to be the largest CPU hogs you can get, especially when you use the highest simulation speed possible. At that point, they're usually literally maxing out your CPU and running it as fast as it can process. As another example of this, Paradox games can not reach their highest speeds on weaker systems or later into the games. They run as fast as the CPU can process, which means nearly 100% utilization. It's not because they aren't efficient. It's because you're telling it to go all out on processing.

That was Jesus the Jew. They follow Jesus the Capitalist.

FYI, CachyOS is Arch based. It has access to the AUR. If you weren't effected, that proves the point.

The AUR is a repository of last resort. It's useful, but you should be careful. That's true even before this even. It's a repository made by users, and is not verified.

Oh hunny, you believing things isn't proof. :((

Oh hunny, the same is true for you. How the fuck can someone be so arrogant? You've provided no evidence and only made claims, and you want people to believe you, but also you're saying believing isn't proof. What? Are you stupid?

What's the proof that he's Russian? You haven't given any proof either, and claiming he as alts where he speaks fluent Russian isn't the same as providing proof of that. People can make any claim they want.

Combating Russian propoganda begins with people being skeptical, and that includes of you.