At least Dad got to touch something for his money. NFTs don't even deliver on their sole mission statement
@lemmy.zip
To own a digital asset that only had one original. Something that could have an identifiable, singular owner despite being a digital asset. Problem is no one gives a shit if you're the original, provable "owner" of a jpg someone else made. Which makes these worthless to all but idiots who fell for it.
The Internet protocol suite (TCP/UDP/IP) is literally a protocol to connect isolated networks hence inter networking. It's foundationally decentralized. You might be able to argue DNS is centralized but nameservers are abundant and you can even choose. Throwing out the Internet because some shit heads are scrapping it with bots is ridiculous and I hope you were just being sarcastic. This problem should be addressed at the legislature level instead of the protocol level.
Nvidia focused more on the ability to perform real time ray tracing (RTX) than on the raw performance of the cards. At the time the RTX performance of the cards was hardly passable and the amount of games that even supported the technically was VERY limited but the fact that they could perform ray tracing in real time at all was a bit of a marvel.
Nvidia leaned hard into this and tried very hard to get everyone on board with this paradigm shift. As reviewers tested these cards and found out that this technology is still very immature, most of them decided to highlight the performance per dollar instead of the new technology. This meant that informed gamers didn't really consider RTX part of the equation when buying the 2000 series cards.
When you looked at it from a pure rasterization perspective the massive increase in price for the marginal increase in gains made these cards really unappealing. Especially to those who already had 1000 and even 900 series cards. As a result this was a generation a lot of gamers skipped or instead choose to go with 1600 series cards later on. These were basically 2000 series cards without the ray tracing and a cheaper price point making them more appealing.
I'll say the same thing to you as I said to them back then. You have to provide proof for claims like that. I really want that to be true and something to be done about it but I need evidence first.
I actually feel this proves his point. Sure it got the wording right but look how unnaturally clean but also chaotic the image is compared to the original. Like the soda machine is missing all its labels and the ice tray as an example
They actually don't even have to do that. They get the money off the fees and limited interest on the transaction and sell the debt as a "prime" investment to your retirement fund or pension. Leaving the common people to hold the bag while they receive millions in fees and no liability
If they were passive speakers being powered through the cables and an amplifier wouldn't the additional impedance of the cable result in a (probably imperceptible) reduction on volume? I agree it wouldn't effect the waveform, and thus, the quality of the sound though.
Couple things. Firstly watchtower is no longer maintained. An alternative is what's up docker(WUD). It mostly functions the same but with a little more setup. I found this to be a near drop in replacement for me.
Secondly as someone who's consistently had a hard time with searxng, I would recommend degoog instead for aggregate search. It just feels so much more modern and usable. It's immensely more simple to setup as well since configuration is mostly done in the interface instead of some several hundred line config file.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...