I read a few ebooks of questionable provenance. I've learned to see past the strange typos, beyond what the OCR recognized, to see the fuzzy imperfect typeset must have been.
@startrek.website
I read a few ebooks of questionable provenance. I've learned to see past the strange typos, beyond what the OCR recognized, to see the fuzzy imperfect typeset must have been.
They don't even know cron exists and you're going to throw them to the wolves by suggesting Systemd? That's like calling in a drone strike to swat a mosquito.
In thousands of songs, I've never noticed Picard doing anything to the length of the files. I tend to manually review every album by running it through Picard and letting it handle the renaming and tagging. That structure used to be Artist/Year Album/Song. I've been less strict about naming the songs themselves. It's always at least track - Title, but sometimes Artist - Album - Disc # - is prepended. Eventually I ran into a situation where I had multiple versions of a release/album with different enough content to warrant keeping both, so now I throw a release ID number (if is exists) after the album name, and inside brackets, for the directory name.
It's a very flat structure by design, so I'm never quibbling about where I sourced something or what particular genre it is when I'm looking for it. That dramatically reduces the likelihood of duplicates too. Real metadata is better left to tags, since that's mostly what any player will see anyway.
If I'm having trouble getting Picard to recognize something it always because: musicbrainz.org is missing the release, doesn't have acoustic ID, or Picard preferred the album track when I'm trying to rename and tag a single or EP. Adding the release info and acoustic ID to musicbrainz is easy and I can usually use the info before the release is even reviewed, but often in trying to add the release I'll find the correct one and now I can help fill out the data about it.
I treat musicbrainz.org as MY metadata database. If a release is missing or has problems, I do the work to make it better. It's good digital citizenship and learning about their rules for releases helps me manage my server better.
Where's the coconut water going to be this time? With the water? With the juice? With the fake juice and sports drinks? With the soda? With the international foods? No, none of these sections are adjacent to one another.
Dishwashers use less water than you will doing the same task. They may not be perfect for every dish, but washing by hand when there is a functional dishwasher is justing pissing away time, effort, and a lot of water.
You can pretty much just throw all of SG-1 and Atlantis into a single playlist ordered by airdate. They'll interleaf and connect narratively in an organic way because they aired together and that was the only real intended ordering.
Also Q*bert.
Correct. My mistake.
I don't know if Clifford D. Simak is lesser known, but his work is pretty foundational for a lot of more modern sci-fi. Before there was "I, Robot", there was "City". Before there were Ewoks, there was "Little Fuzzy". Before there were living ships like in Farscape, Lexx, or Xenogenesis, there was "The Visitors".
I should have remembered that was H. Beam Piper. Also great.
You say something like this despite the mounting evidence that these state sponsored murder programs have not found competent people willing to be a party to murder.
A good environmental philosophy class would cover these same topics and more. My syllabus included works by E. O. Wilson (The Diversity of Life), Lynn Margulis (Microcosmos), and Rachel Carson (Silent Spring), and others. There's probably and entire Dewey decimal section of you ask a librarian. Stewardship vs leaving nature to itself was a pretty hot topic with lots of debate. But generally anything we can do to support biodiversity is a net good specifically because species go extinct. There's lots of explanations out there, but like LeVar Burton said, "You don't have to take my word for it."
Give em The Harkness Test

I know I've seen this before. This appears to be an AI generated version of a very similar image posted in January of 2023 on Reddit, Facebook, and probably others. I used a combination of Google image search and tineye.com to figure this out. This apparently AI version makes the woman skinnier, removes her sleeves, declutters the background, and adds a black clutch. The history of this meme was tricky to search for because it has blown up in popularity recently (on Instagram, Xitter, Reddit, even YouTube) and Reddit's history is full of deleted posts.
Links: https://www.facebook.com/...
https://tineye.com/search/62f2061f28c29668e35ae4b65149fcbfeaf7131d?sort=score&order=desc&page=1
If I was about to go on tour with my best friend and he said something stupid that put us in danger from real life lunatics with guns, I'd fucking cancel the tour too because I cared about us both and our relationship. Besides, if you can't tell your friends they're wrong when they're wrong, they're not really your friend. This isn't necessarily the act of betrayal you're making it out to be.
I'm betting that making this statement publicly makes it easier to break the tour contracts, rather than backing out of the tour without saying why.
Everyone should just report the error to Google over and over and over again. Remind them that the federal government doesn't actually have unilateral authority to rename major international geographic features on the whim of a single deranged despot.
They may have used the word wrong, but getting parodied by Weird Al is actually more prestigious than winning a Grammy. Not because Weird Al parodies are rare, but because he only parodies songs that are actually pretty good. I have trouble believing that if the song were actually bad, playing it on accordion with jokey lyrics would be an improvement. There's no Weird Al parody of a Nickelback song, that I know of.
More like working class traitor.
Air frying a frozen chicken is like the perfect way to burn the outside while keeping the inside raw.
Do I really even want to know what LinkedIn games are?
I don't ask people about their politics. I just act like true things are true, e.g.: human instigated climate change, COVID, the efficiency of a single payer healthcare system, a oblate spheroid earth, and the moon landing. I'm politely understanding of the flaws in their world view, but I NEVER pretend that any of it is even up for debate. You can balance not being rude with not backing down from the objective reality you live in by showing an genuine fascination with their weird cult beliefs.
Conspiracy theories, religion, myths, and magic are all very comfortable fantasies that wither in the face of the existential dread from understanding that the universe is horrific and absolutely indifferent to your personal suffering. Being excellent to each other and maintaining faith in the potential of humanity (tempered by knowledge of our depravity) is our only hope of survival both physical, philosophical, political, and spiritual.
Ok, sorry that turned into a rant. This shit matters though, so not that sorry.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...