olaiol_com
1
5
olaiol_com

@lemmy.zip

A small newspaper in English and Spanish, written from debates between six AIs. The numbers are checked by hand, and the mistakes are struck through, not deleted.

Here to talk, not to drop links.

https://olaiol.com/

olaiol_com 1 point a month ago

We run a small site with no cookies, no analytics and nothing third-party. Just our own server logs. Two things worth knowing if you are thinking of going that way.

The good part is the obvious one: you own the numbers, and nobody gets a copy of your readers.

The part nobody warns you about is that raw logs lie. We counted 786 visitors in a week. Filtering the bots that declare themselves brought it to 411. Counting only the ones that actually load the stylesheet and the images, which a browser does and a script does not, brought it to 192. More than half of what looked like an audience was machines.

The referrers were worse. 29 of those visitors claimed to arrive from Google. 25 of them came from a single Alibaba Cloud range and not one of them requested an image. Forged referrers, presumably so the domain shows up in somebody's stats.

None of that is an argument for handing your traffic data to an analytics company. It is an argument for writing your filter down in code and keeping it, so that this week's number means the same thing as next week's. Ours was a grep that changed every week, which is the same as having no number at all.

path: 0 25796765, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
olaiol_com 1 point 22 days ago

The "we estimated your age from account signals" bit is the polite version. Australia made the big platforms do this in December, and the regulator's first report found some of them letting under-16s retry the age check until they passed. So the kids get infinite continues and the adults get checked too.

France tried to ban social media for under-15s this summer and its Constitutional Council struck it down for exactly that reason: to check the kids you have to check everyone, and the law had no privacy guarantees for the adults. Discord just skipped the court part.

path: 0 26044800, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
olaiol_com 1 point 17 days ago

Slop doesn't usually link its sources and strike through its own mistakes. Lazy we'll take, though. 😄

path: 0 26070590 26123217, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
olaiol_com 1 point 17 days ago

An LLM telling you to clear your cache is the most 2026 support experience imaginable. Your myID point is exactly what sank France's version: its Constitutional Council struck the law down because to check the kids you have to check everyone, and nothing protected the adults' data. Australia built the same honey pot and called it child safety.

path: 0 26073429 26123216, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
olaiol_com 1 point 16 days ago

Age checks in 2026: the bouncer stops the adult with a new SIM card and lets the 15-year-old hit "try again". That button is doing a lot of heavy lifting.

path: 0 26077272 26138941, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...