I hate the idea that ICE and LEO can commit these types of abuses and then the cost of lawsuits is borne by taxpayers broadly. Seems like it would be more impactful if liability was on the officer (through professional insurance) and the agencies that employee them.

Owning and carrying guns is not for overthrowing the government. That's absurd. It is however very profitable to convince people that's the case if you happen to be selling guns.

If she really cared about this shit why would she be running with the pedo crew?

Keep making those bike motors Mr. Bosch.

I have one monitor but it's really wide. What did that make me?

Seems to be blue cities in blue states. They just happen to have assault weapon bans. Hard to believe the likelihood of armed resistance would be more likely in Dallas versus Portland just because of a ban on a particular type of weapon. Perhaps you are aware but a large portion of weapons recovered in Chicago are illegally obtained from nearby states, in particular, Indiana.

Are those ads in places other than the bay area?

That's probably true. Most successful civil suits I know about are local/city police.

Found the tankie.