Losses of the Russian military to 4.7.2023

The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 04.07.23 were approximately:

personnel - about 231030 (+770) people were liquidated,
tanks - 4059 (+2) units
APVs - 7908 (+9) units
artillery systems - 4252 (+32) units,
MLRS - 647 (+6) units,
air defense systems / Anti-aircraft warfare systems - 394 (+3) units
aircraft - 315 (+0) units
helicopters - 309 (+0) units,
UAV operational-tactical level - 3602 (+29),
cruise missiles - 1264 (+0),
ships / boats / warships / boats - 18 (+0) units,
vehicles and fuel tanks - 6843 (+9) units,
special equipment - 590 (+0).

EvilCartyen 9 points 3 years ago

Still lots of artillery being hit, seems they're still clearing the way for the main phase of the counteroffensive. I wonder if we'll see a breakthrough at any point, like in Kharkiv, or if that was a lucky punch.

save

path: 0 800993, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0

peereboominc 5 points 3 years ago

That is brutal. 231 thousand Russian humans being killed for a dumb war just to try and grab some land.

save

path: 0 801357, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 6

Schaedelbach 6 points 3 years ago

I am very certain that number includes also injured and missing soldiers. Still mind boggling.

save

path: 0 801357 804062, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1

Jives 2 points 3 years ago

It absolutely does include wounded. Ukraine keeps their wording vague, perhaps on purpose, but there’s no way their estimate of KIA is 4-5x higher than any credible western estimate.

It’s still an absurd number of casualties, and it’s absurd that Russian citizens don’t seem to care at all.

save

path: 0 801357 804062 835863, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

NukeminHerttua 4 points 3 years ago

More like trying to stay in power (and alive) no matter what. Totally useless war, but then again, most of them are...

save

path: 0 801357 804084, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0

haakon 3 points 3 years ago

As if Russia even needs more land.

save

path: 0 801357 808365, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2

Uniquitous 4 points 3 years ago

As I understand their war aims, they need this particular land because without it they lose access to the Black Sea, which severely curtails their access to the Atlantic. Their other ports are in the North Atlantic and tend to be frozen over and unusable during the winter. If they lose Sevastopol, they're greatly reduced as an Atlantic power.

save

path: 0 801357 808365 809648, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1

haakon 1 point 3 years ago

They could realistically have kept Sevastopol and the rest of Crimea if they just hadn't invaded the rest of Ukraine; now it's all at stake.

But even so, if they lose Sevastopol, there are other Russian ports along the Black Sea, notably Novorossiysk. While that's much less strategically located, and costly upgrades would be required to function as a marine base, it's not strictly true that they would lose access to the Black Sea altogether.

Apologies in advance if this is hopelessly armchair, happy to have my amateur observations nuanced.

save

path: 0 801357 808365 809648 847979, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

Uniquitous 3 points 3 years ago

Tank losses have slowed to a bare trickle. I guess Ivan is out of armor.

save

path: 0 806267, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

wr90 2 points 3 years ago

How to even imagine this 770 people per day!

save

path: 0 829066, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0