French government could cut off social media during unrest, says Macron

3 years ago by Reclipse to c/world

Comments came as ministers blame young people using platforms like TikTok to incite violence after shooting of teenager

Here is a summary of the article:

• French President Emmanuel Macron has said the government should have the power to control social media networks during periods of unrest.

• Macron made the comments during an interview with a French TV station. He was referring to recent protests in France against the government's cost of living policies.

• Macron said during periods of crisis, the government needs the power to "block content that goes against republican values and is clearly creating confusion and putting people's lives at risk."

• Critics say Macron's call for more government control of social media raises concerns about censorship and freedom of speech.

• Opposition politicians accused Macron of attacking fundamental French freedoms and wanting to restrict the free flow of information.

• Macron countered that social media networks are already heavily regulated in France over issues like hate speech and terrorist propaganda. He argued the government needed similar powers during unrest.

baascus 27 points 3 years ago

If Macron persists in his autocratic style, I can't help but wonder—given France's historical penchant for the guillotine—what might be metaphorically 'cut off' next.

path: 0 853070, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 0
zefiax 20 points 3 years ago

How can a modern democracy even consider doing this? I mean I am not fan of most social media but still, this sounds like something you would see in Iran or China.

path: 0 861485, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 2
baascus 8 points 3 years ago

The implementation of such measures in a democratic society should be viewed as an infringement on freedom of speech and expression, which are fundamental rights in a democracy. The balance between maintaining public safety and upholding civil liberties is a delicate one. Therefore, these measures must be considered as a last resort in extreme situations. The current situation doesn’t appear to be extreme.

path: 0 861485 865360, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
reclipse 2 points 3 years ago

This happens in India on a regular basis.

path: 0 861485 865360 874024, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ConTheLibrarian 11 points 3 years ago path: 0 854613, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
Fiivemacs 10 points 3 years ago

How the frig they gonna cut off just 'social media's access? Or do they mean the big 3 or 4 sites only..

path: 0 852846, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 6
markr 11 points 3 years ago

Same way Iran China Russia etc do it. Put up a Great Firewall, block all the people not protesting anything from accessing their psychosis generating social media sites, meanwhile the protesters all figure out how to work around it. The benefit to the government is that it pisses off the non-participants and makes it easier for the government to crush dissent.

path: 0 852846 853728, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 2
Fiivemacs 3 points 3 years ago

So block everything and not just 'social media'. That's more my point

path: 0 852846 853728 854763, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
markr 2 points 3 years ago

That sounds difficult. They would have to make a lot of exceptions in order to not shut down their economy. I've worked in China. Every foreign corporate building had a vpn allowed through the firewall, all the chinese workers had access to the global internet. It was a giant gushing hole. I think I asked and my chinese colleagues said that lots of chines tech companies also had global access. Now of course I also assume that the Chinese government monitored all the leaks, as they monitor everything else, as do we.

path: 0 852846 853728 854763 860861, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
havilland 7 points 3 years ago

First they would try to block it on the ISP DNS servers. But this is easily circumvented if you know how.

My guess is he is just throwing out stupid ideas without knowing how to get them implemented.

path: 0 852846 856040, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
pizzatime 2 points 3 years ago

he has no intention of implementing any of these measures. he's just saying what his voters want to hear

path: 0 852846 856040 861181, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
plz1 5 points 3 years ago

They'd mandate French ISPs and mobile carriers to block/disable the DNS records related tot he big social media companies. Anyone savvy enough to use encrypted DNS, non-ISP DNS, or a VPN would see no impact. That said, this would be a huge impact to many non-savvy users that are just important to protests as those of the savvy crew, like us Lemmy kin.

path: 0 852846 862469, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
theacharnian 10 points 3 years ago

If Orban had said this, it would have been outrage, and rightly so. But liberal darling Macron says it and from luminaries like Verhofstadt there is only crickets...

(I'm using "liberal" in the European sense, not the US sense.)

path: 0 869764, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Mautobu 8 points 3 years ago

Isn't this sort of policy what the fediverse is meant to distrupt?

path: 0 869145, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 3
reclipse 4 points 3 years ago

They can block fb, twitter directly. But how will they block every instance on Fediverse?

path: 0 869145 873969, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
InverseParallax 3 points 3 years ago

China's great firewall has joined the chat.

path: 0 869145 873969 875028, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
reclipse 5 points 3 years ago

China basically operates on whitelisting method.

path: 0 869145 873969 875028 875169, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
pitl 7 points 3 years ago

Well, that will set a lovely precedent for other "free" democracies... the people are angry at you? Just take their voice! What could go wrong...

path: 0 864653, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
world
world

@lemmy.world

login for more options
58536
34940
9318

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world

Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/...

  • Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link

go to feed...