Russians could blow up nuclear plant to halt Ukraine's forces, Zelenskyy warns

3 years ago by MicroWave to c/news

Zelenskyy also said Ukraine will not yield any territory.
0Empty0 17 points 3 years ago

This is a possibility that has been talked about at length for a while now.

It's possible, however an attack like this would be considered a nuclear attack, which would bring NATO into this war. Consequently, if Russian allies like Belarus blow up the plant instead this would also trigger a response from NATO.

Obviously we should be concerned, but I'm not sure how likely an attack like this would actually happen.

path: 0 1039517, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
jesterraiin 6 points 3 years ago

could

In spite of all my sympathies for the cause, I am adamant that all articles based on "it's possible" mentality and nothing more, should be banned and people writing them sent to some war.

path: 0 1039674, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
yumcake 12 points 3 years ago

The concern is a good bit higher than "possible" since they've just recently inflicted a large scale natural disaster to slow the Ukrainian offensive to retake their territory.

The Kakhovka dam was blown up by Russians because Ukraine doesn't own the kinds of weapons that could destroy it from a distance even if they for some reason wanted to devastate their own land (they don't).

Russia clearing out the plant staff and inspectors is highly suspect. If there was a major radiation leak, that too would have to come from manually placed demolitions...which is what they've been seeing.

path: 0 1039674 1040062, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
jesterraiin 5 points 3 years ago

I don't see it that way. Flood you can predict to some good degree - especially if the water will spill on enemy's territory.

Powerplant? When the wind will blow, the radiation will go. It may as well blow in the wrong direction and devastate Russia. Weather is too chaotic an entity, especially these days, to have a battleplan founded on it.

There's of course "dem Russians crazy, yo" argument, but to this there's a contra-argument. For every politician actor, or a corrupted military guy there are tenths of VERY rich people living there, who would prefer their skyscraper dachas free of nuclear pollution, thank you very much.

path: 0 1039674 1040062 1041935, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Tebza255 -3 points 3 years ago

Obviously it's Ukraine that's going to bomb it and blame Russia **

path: 0 1049843, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 2
rusticus1773 3 points 3 years ago

It is amazing to me that people even consider this a possibility. You’d have to be an idiot to think anyone but Russia would blow up a nuclear reactor in Ukraine. The same for the dam - Russia blames Ukraine, which is an argument no one outside of the Russian media bubble would even consider.

path: 0 1049843 1074443, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Tebza255 0 points 3 years ago

The Russo phobia in the west throws common sense out of the brains.

path: 0 1049843 1074443 1085602, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
38083
38673
9285

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...