That post seems to be missing.
load all comments
sotimely 8 points 3 years ago

I need more education before I can answer the class thing. I don't own anything, and I'm definitely not going to be able to retire or get sick, like, ever. But in the short term I am paid more than a lot of workers. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

path: 0 20464, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 4
CriticalResist8 14 points 3 years ago

Labour aristocracy would probably fit you the best. The labour aristocracy isn't really a class in the Marxist sense, but it's a good "in-between" to proletariat and petite bourgeoisie, as the labour aristocracy are still technically proletariat and yet tends to identify with the petite bourgeoisie. It doesn't prevent one from becoming a communist of course, this applies to the non-class-conscious workers. We can also understand the labour aristocracy as the placated proletariat, the subset that gets benefits so as to reduce their class consciousness.

Otherwise you would be proletariat.

path: 0 20464 21624, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
felipeforte 12 points 3 years ago

You may just be on a higher "scale" on the labor division. Intellectual workers, for instance, are usually paid more when there is a lot of market demand for their skills. If your major source of income is salary/wage, you may just be a slightly well paid proletarian

path: 0 20464 24743, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
yearningforfreedom 9 points 3 years ago

Well what do you do

path: 0 20464 20524, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
sotimely 3 points 3 years ago

i teach rich kids about what america did

path: 0 20464 20524 44933, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...