Colorado Bill Mandates Higher Density Housing Near Transit

2 years ago by TinMod to c/politics

Why it matters The Colorado legislature has passed a groundbreaking bill (pun intended), HB24-1313, that requires cities designated as "transit-oriented communities" to allow greater residential density near transit lines. The move is expected to increase housing affordability and promote sustainable development in the state.
Alteon 45 points 2 years ago

Weird that a policy article has a thumbnail of random steak....it's not even mentioned in the article.

path: 0 9952282, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 3
ptz 17 points 2 years ago

Lol, okay. I thought maybe my instance screwed up the thumbnail generation or something. Glad I'm not the only one confused.

path: 0 9952282 9952464, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
TinMod 7 points 2 years ago path: 0 9952282 9954000, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
lechatron -1 points 2 years ago
path: 0 9952282 9954059, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
MrJameGumb 24 points 2 years ago

Was "Iconic Denver Steaks from Denver, CO" really the best image they could think to use for an article about affordable housing?

path: 0 9952501, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 4
PP_BOY_ 8 points 2 years ago

Tbf, that's a nice looking steak

path: 0 9952501 9952509, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 3
TinMod 3 points 2 years ago

It's a underrated cut of steak

path: 0 9952501 9952509 9953381, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
AdamEatsAss 3 points 2 years ago

Hell, I'd take a train from my house to the grocery store to buy that steak.

path: 0 9952501 9952509 9953381 9955729, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
billwashere 2 points 2 years ago

I’m really liking this train of thought.

path: 0 9952501 9952509 9953381 9955729 10008358, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
MegaUltraChicken 11 points 2 years ago

I for one agree that higher density housing should have access to the best cuts of meat available.

path: 0 9955722, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
just_another_person 8 points 2 years ago

path: 0 9957339, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
Tujio 4 points 2 years ago

If you get lost in the woods, fuck it, build a house!

"I was lost, now I live here! I've severely improved my predicament!"

  • Mitch Hedburg
path: 0 9957339 9960339, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
TokenBoomer -1 points 2 years ago path: 0 9956508, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
31376
33947
9297

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

go to feed...