Proton I generally trust because they have made it abundantly clear just what they will give over to authorities in the event of a court order. I would rather it be less but I also prefer that over "We have your back and will fight the CIA if need be" nonsense.

That said: Bitwarden is still the kind of this. And the big issue with a keepass you sync (which I used to do) is that you can't really use that with yubikey style devices because it will get out of sync as far as the authentication codes go.

I love Bitwarden, but goddamn, they need to figure out form filling. They have my cards, passwords, TOTP, address, and name. And I always end up having to flip back and forth.

Competition is always good.

Bitwarden doesn't have the best UX design

It also got a 100 million USD investment a couple of years ago and even if it hasn't changed there might be issues in the future and I really don't want to learn how self hosting working if bitwarden enshittifies.

I still prefer Bitwarden because the server is source-available and most of the code is free and open source. There's also the FOSS Vaultwarden server fork that I can switch to at any time.

Proton Pass also using end-to-end encryption with FOSS clients is nice, but the server code is completely closed source.

I honestly can't stand comments like these. Why is every technology discussion on Lemmy dominated by people congratulating themselves for using something 'better'? Most of the time without even being asked.

This comment reads like one of those 1-star establishment reviews on Google that says "I've never been there".