Agree that the UP is top shelf. Though Wisconsin has beautiful landscape as well.
If We Had to Turn One Midwest State Into a National Park, Which Would You Choose and Why?
3 years ago by Bob to c/askmidwest
Voyagers is on a road trip plan of mine - I basically found it by looking at Google maps, not from a web search (which I had done before just looking around).
I would have to agree. All the wilderness that is out there along with changing environments and terrain really makes for some amazing scenery as well as places for wildlife to really blossom.
Carve out the SE corner of Minnesota, SW Wisconsin, and NE Iowa. Bang: you got Driftless National Park
I cannot upvote this enough. What a great investment in our future.
Whelp, whoever was pushing for Driftless gave up. The usual "we don't want the government to come in here and tell us what to do" fears killed it. :(
michigan... just for the upper peninsula really. too much of the natural landscape of the midwest has been torn down for crops :/
I want my wetlands and plains back! 😫
Wisconsin because its my state and its awesome
Michigan. It's the midwest's hidden treasure for natural beauty.
Really if just make Upper the National Park it gets the job done and there's still a whole state left.
@midwest.social
A place to ask questions to the midwest.social community
go to feed...
@midwest.social
A place to ask questions to the midwest.social community
go to feed...
Minnesota or Michigan. These states have some of the best Great Lakes shoreline and are less inhabited in their north ends. If the UP counted as it’s own state, I’d say the UP.
save