If We Had to Turn One Midwest State Into a National Park, Which Would You Choose and Why?

3 years ago by Bob to c/askmidwest

load all comments
owisco 25 points 3 years ago

Minnesota or Michigan. These states have some of the best Great Lakes shoreline and are less inhabited in their north ends. If the UP counted as it’s own state, I’d say the UP.

path: 0 251746, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 5
pelotron 7 points 3 years ago

Agree that the UP is top shelf. Though Wisconsin has beautiful landscape as well.

path: 0 251746 258887, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
owisco 6 points 3 years ago

Come to think of it, Minnesota already has a National park too (Voyagers). It’s funny because I know from Minnesota goes to the boundary waters and I hardly hear people talk about Voyagers.

path: 0 251746 251799, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
spamellama 5 points 3 years ago

Voyagers is on a road trip plan of mine - I basically found it by looking at Google maps, not from a web search (which I had done before just looking around).

path: 0 251746 251799 272095, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
simsymbiote 5 points 3 years ago

I would have to agree. All the wilderness that is out there along with changing environments and terrain really makes for some amazing scenery as well as places for wildlife to really blossom.

path: 0 251746 255343, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
beardsley 2 points 3 years ago

Seconding Michigan. We live in MO and loved MI so much it's now an annual trip. We love the Crystal Lake area and it's a great springboard for a trip to the UP and Canada.

path: 0 251746 577965, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
askmidwest

@midwest.social

login for more options
1011
25
12

A place to ask questions to the midwest.social community

go to feed...