Question: is there a reason to use arch over something like kubuntu, or ubuntu? It seems like a difficult starting point

3 years ago by indite to c/archlinux

load all comments
SkierniewiceBoi 3 points 3 years ago

Arch is a rolling release that gets the newest software once it's available. Ubuntus is Debian-based and it's also following the principle of stability over modernity so there's a big difference between how recent software you're gonna run on those two types of distros. But if you want to try the rolling approach you doesn't have to go directly for arch, you can use some Arch-based distro like M*****o (not recommended due to justified controversy). I know there are also Arco, Artix and Garuda that are arch based but I didn't test them. You could use them, experience pacman and aur but without struggle of setting up arch and once you get comfortable you may want to give arch a try

path: 0 243392, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
original_ish_name 4 points 3 years ago

No recommending manjarno :(

  • DDOSed the aur: 2 times

  • Let their SSL certificate expire: 3 time

I might have got my numbers wrong

Stuff that actually affect users:

Manjaro holds back regular packages by one day but not aur packages, leading to dependency issues

path: 0 243392 246112, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
SkierniewiceBoi 1 point 3 years ago

Good call out I'll update the comments. From my reading it also seems like they take a lot from arch sources but don't really contribute so another downside here

path: 0 243392 246112 246252, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
CoolCatNick 2 points 3 years ago

I want to point out that stable in this context doesn't necessarily mean less buggy but means that the system changes less.

path: 0 243392 243948, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
SkierniewiceBoi 1 point 3 years ago

Right, from my experience it means that you just have to wait much longer for the bug fix to reach your device. From PC perspective I like the rolling approach much more as I feel much more up to date with the software that I'm using especially when it's mostly foss where I browse the open issues and release notes on a regular basis

path: 0 243392 243948 246471, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
evadzs 1 point 3 years ago

I've used Garuda and I think it's great. It has bootable Snapper snapshots enabled by default, a post-install wizard for software, and a custom update script that's not too customized but does a couple neat things like warn you if Grub has been updated. It's biggest criticism is bloat, but on modern hardware it's fine. Still runs better than Windows.

path: 0 243392 287417, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
archlinux
archlinux

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
10009
427
77

The beloved lightweight distro

go to feed...