Milton strengthens to Category 5 hurricane

2 years ago by MicroWave to c/news

Milton rapidly intensified to a Category 5 hurricane late Monday morning.

Within hours, Milton strengthened to a Category 2, then a Category 3, then a Category 4 and finally a Category 5.

Milton now ranks as the third-greatest 24-hour wind speed intensification for a hurricane in the Atlantic Basin. (Records are based on data since the satellite era began in the 1960s.)

load all comments
bradorsomething 93 points 2 years ago

At least the insurance companies will only have to rebuild some houses once after 2 hurricanes

path: 0 12765172, hotness: undefined, score: 93, children: 32
Today 124 points 2 years ago

If your policy covers wind they claim the damage is from water. If your policy covers water, they claim the damage is from wind. If your policy covers both, they claim a hurricane is exempt as an act of god.

path: 0 12765172 12765397, hotness: undefined, score: 124, children: 6
Grandwolf319 3 points 2 years ago

I want to bitch about insurance companies but insurance is for something that is unavoidable.

All this shit is becoming more and more avoidable.

path: 0 12765172 12765397 12781974, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Dogiedog64 -18 points 2 years ago

Which, to be fair, is really about all they can do. You CANNOT stop a hurricane from obliterating a house. There is NOTHING the average American can do about it except leave and hope it survives.

path: 0 12765172 12765397 12771704, hotness: undefined, score: -18, children: 4
superkret 57 points 2 years ago

Insurance companies don't build shit. They just collect money from people, and sometimes give some of it back.

path: 0 12765172 12765301, hotness: undefined, score: 57, children: 10
ColeSloth 27 points 2 years ago

They're actually required to give 85% of everything back, so they give back most of it. It seems like Florida is becoming too much of a hassle to insure, though. Some companies have pulled out of florida.

path: 0 12765172 12765301 12765939, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 5
baldingpudenda 15 points 2 years ago

Begrudgingly cover*

path: 0 12765172 12765301 12765340, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 3
sinceasdf 22 points 2 years ago

Many insurance companies won't even insure homes in much of Florida.

path: 0 12765172 12766906, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 1
frezik 4 points 2 years ago

And the rest are probably planning to.

path: 0 12765172 12766906 12771587, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Lumilias 19 points 2 years ago

What insurance companies? They all backed out of Florida years ago. Now it’s state funded home insurance footing the bill.

path: 0 12765172 12769263, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 3
AnarchistArtificer 13 points 2 years ago

I read a thing recently that insurance companies are getting increasingly skittish all over the country, even places that wouldn't traditionally be considered risky, because yay, climate change.

The interesting thing about it was that insurance companies' insurance is increasingly the thing that's causing issues, because it's getting harder for the risk to be spread out. That is to say that insurance companies financially rely on areas with low rates of natural disasters because they end up being a net positive due to insurance premiums and no need for payout. Fewer of these "safe" areas mean the insurance companies struggle to stay solvent and have to rely on their own insurance policies to have their back, but those meta-insurance companies have apparently been historically loud about climate change — probably because besides the government, they're the ones who have to pony up

path: 0 12765172 12769263 12773183, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
RestrictedAccount 4 points 2 years ago

No problem. The 0ld coots in Florida that vote won’t be around when the bill comes due.

path: 0 12765172 12769263 12770437, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
nulluser 0 points 2 years ago

If people don't have the common sense to not build houses in places that are guaranteed to be destroyed by a natural disaster sooner than later, then I shouldn't have to subsidize their rebuilding costs through my insurance premiums.

path: 0 12765172 12766254, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 7
RestrictedAccount 11 points 2 years ago

That’s what the people in the North Carolina mountains thought.

path: 0 12765172 12766254 12770452, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
Tarquinn2049 8 points 2 years ago

Yeah, used to be that insurance costs were almost directly skewed based on risk. But then people were upset that it costed so much to insure some places(the ones that should be prohibitively expensive to insure). And then slowly over time they baked in little increases in price everywhere else to subsidise huge price cuts in those areas to out-compete the companies that put the onus entirely on the people taking risks. Eventually, as it became more and more widespread to do that, it became financially more viable to spread it out rather than have drastically more expensive areas. And now we all have to partially cover people who are taking way more risk than we would.

path: 0 12765172 12766254 12768271, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
ApatheticCactus 3 points 2 years ago

That or build something that can stand up to being hit. Tall order, but the inner armchair engineer in me thinks it's like, totally possible.

path: 0 12765172 12766254 12768092, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
39530
40322
9854

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...