Do you still have the Google search engine added? I always fully remove it, since Searx pulls from Google anyways, I don't really see the point in keeping it.

save

path: 0 271980, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1

BendyLemmy 3 points 3 years ago

There's no reason not to leave it alone... though choosing a better default is advisable.

There are many times when SearX isn't a good solution (though SearX or SearXNG are a great default)... Your answer is 'popular' because everyone hates Google. But also problematic, because it will lead to folks trying something else and then just going back to the best one.

You're defeating your own aims.

Though you can punch through with DDG style bangs...

!!b for Bing

For this search, Duckduckgo is probably nicer. Adding - and not removing stuff from Firefox gives you the simple choice to use keywords:

Now see what happens if we try to get an 'ebook' copy of 'The Hobbit':

ebook the hobbit a direct download link. Nice (because I added annas-archive with the keyword 'ebook').

So really, the trick is more to

Break Google's stronghold on your internet. Right now the internet is virtually owned by Google, Reddit, Meta.
Find out why Google Search now has trouble giving you good results the way I remember it did ten years or more in the past.
Be more flexible.
Don't forget that it's also very easy to add 'lml' for 'Lemmy.ml' search (though it's currently down, so I'll try Lemmy.World instead: lw firefox

save

path: 0 271980 284851, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

Azzu 3 points 3 years ago

Nope, never happened to me in 10+ years of usage, except when completely reinstalling after wiping everything.

save

path: 0 293959, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

artic 3 points 3 years ago

Only when I reinstall not update

save

path: 0 280357, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

Zerby 2 points 3 years ago

Happened twice ~6 months ago, even though I've removed Google from search engines. After that it never happened again. It's annoying but it happened only a couple times so it's not a big deal for me

save

path: 0 288567, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

sin_free_for_00_days 2 points 3 years ago

Hell no

save

path: 0 274727, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

sexy_peach 1 point 3 years ago

Interesting. I did a quick search and found these old threads: https://forum.manjaro.org/..., https://forum.manjaro.org/.... These people have a similar problem, also on manjaro. I don't want to investigate any further tbh.

save

path: 0 318193, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1

BananaTrifleViolin 1 point 3 years ago

Maybe something they're doing with their custom build of Firefox? You could switch to a different Arch repo just for Firefox, or Snap/Flatpak versions or install directly from the Mozilla build.

I use Mint, and use the Mozilla PPA's Ubuntu builds instead of the Mint ones as I had some minor annoyances. Not sure if it's a good idea to go down a Deb route on Arch though? Not something I've tried. I don't think Mozilla maintains an Arch build themselves?

save

path: 0 318193 386781, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

realitista 1 point 3 years ago

I don't ever recall this happening on an update. On a fresh install only.

save

path: 0 285003, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

/c/firefox

Rules

Reporting

/c/firefox

Rules

Reporting