Yearly reminder that github still does not have an IPv6 address (2023)

Try the following:

$ nslookup github.com
[...]
Non-authoritative answer:
Name:   github.com
Address: 140.82.121.3

NateNate60 82 points 3 years ago

"IPv6 is not a feature; its absence is a bug"

Someone on the Flathub repo, I think

save

path: 0 1694036, hotness: undefined, score: 82, children: 2

iamak 25 points 3 years ago

I always use Github to check if my IPv4 DNS works lol (using ping). So it's definitely a feature /s

save

path: 0 1694036 1694068, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 1

Sigmatics 3 points 3 years ago

When you're relying on a bug as a feature

save

path: 0 1694036 1694068 1728155, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

GoodKingElliot 82 points 3 years ago

comment from the forum:

New ISPs in my country are IPv6-only because there is no new IPv4 space to be provided to them. They do have a over-shared IPv4 address by CGNAT but due to the oversharing, it is unstable and not rare to be offline. For these companies, the internet access is stable only in IPv6.

Thinking about the server-side, some cloud providers are making extra charges for IPv4 addresses (e.g.: Vultr.com) so most of the servers in my company are IPv6-only. Cloning github repositories is very cumbersome due to the lack of IPv6 support and this issue affects me and my team mates on a daily basis.

The math is simple: there are 4.88 billion internet users in the world but the IPv4 space only provides 4 billion addresses. It's over: IPv4 is obsolete and is provided in a legacy mode. Current applications and services must be IPv6 enabled otherwise it should be seen as obsolete. For that matter, Github.com is an obsolete service because it relies on obsolete technology as IPv4.

save

path: 0 1695638, hotness: undefined, score: 82, children: 6

VonReposti 38 points 3 years ago

Funny how different situations can be. I can't get an IPv6 address unless I pay for insanely expensive business tiers.

save

path: 0 1695638 1697927, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 3

Mubelotix 10 points 3 years ago

I had a very small cheap ISP in France (Quantic Telecom) and they didn't even monitor their network for ipv6 issues. I had to report problems myself every other week. They had less than 90% uptime in 2023, so I ended up getting a refund

save

path: 0 1695638 1697927 1706821, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1

singinwhale 9 points 3 years ago

Oof, imagine having to put a single 9 into your SLA. You would be laughed out of the room in a commercial setting.

save

path: 0 1695638 1697927 1706821 1726181, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0

orangeboats 1 point 3 years ago

The IPv4 exhaustion is far more gnarly in developing countries. Something on the scale of hundreds of people sharing one IPv4 address.

If I want to get a public IPv4 address from my ISP, I have to spend extra. Some ISPs in my country simply don't give public IPv4 addresses anymore. They have completely exhausted their pool.

save

path: 0 1695638 1697927 1811084, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

Sigmatics 5 points 3 years ago

Roasted

save

path: 0 1695638 1706598, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0

Kissaki 2 points 3 years ago

I wonder if they ever contacted github support, and what their answer was - rather than only posting on a public forum github doesn't feel compelled to answer or make official responses to.

save

path: 0 1695638 1727730, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

zouden 28 points 3 years ago

I've still never used ipv6. It just never offered anything I needed.

save

path: 0 1694550, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 16

Giooschi 47 points 3 years ago

If you live in the USA you don't suffer from the problem it solves because you have ~5 IP v4 addresses per capita (totaling to 41% of all the IP v4 addresses), and likewise many european countries have ~2 per capita (although there are expeptions like Italy and Spain which are a bit under 1 per capita). However many other countries don't have such luxury, for example in india there's one for every 36 people, which is obviously not enough and thus they have to either use NAT everywhere or switch to IPv6.

save

path: 0 1694550 1697719, hotness: undefined, score: 47, children: 8

otl 20 points 3 years ago

I’m in Indonesia right now. Stuff can be randomly offline or blocked because they think I’ve already accessed or am spamming something. Even little things like New York Times saying “you’ve reached your free limit for today” but I didn’t even have internet access for a couple of days!

save

path: 0 1694550 1697719 1701628, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0

zouden 3 points 3 years ago

There isn't 5 addresses per person in the US. They use NAT like everyone else. I think you know this though.

save

path: 0 1694550 1697719 1730501, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2

nickhammes 8 points 3 years ago

No the number is public. The IPv4 addresses allocated to the US are about 1.524 Billion, and there are ~332 million people in the US. Most of those IPv4 addresses are allocated to servers in datacenters, but individual people having a public IP for their house is really common. Yeah, your devices are behind NAT, but you can get one. To their point, in countries like India, people outnumber IPv4 addresses so much this isn't possible. Just getting people there online in a way they can interact with the IPv4 Internet is tricky to do well.

save

path: 0 1694550 1697719 1730501 1742859, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1

zouden 1 point 3 years ago

They are allocated in levels though, so you can't just get an individual unused address if the top level has been allocated to IBM or Cisco or the DoD. It's not democratic.

save

path: 0 1694550 1697719 1730501 1742859 1754711, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

EatMyDick -35 points 3 years ago

Have you tried being less poor?

save

path: 0 1694550 1697719 1700042, hotness: undefined, score: -35, children: 3

ImpossibleRubiksCube 2 points 3 years ago

save

path: 0 1694550 1697719 1700042 1724532, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

kionite231 1 point 3 years ago

save

path: 0 1694550 1697719 1700042 1728247, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

Giooschi -2 points 3 years ago

Luckily for me I'm not poor.

save

path: 0 1694550 1697719 1700042 1703361, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0

IceMan 9 points 3 years ago

Same. I’m hearing it’s a must-have for like 15 years now. It still obviously isn’t a real must-have.

save

path: 0 1694550 1694679, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 5

redcalcium 18 points 3 years ago

This is because ISPs keep piling on workaround after workaround in order to scale their use of IPv4, which is working but not without some disadvantages. Also, like other commenters mentioned, the western world have an unfair advantage in IPv4 addresses allocation and thus people living there don't really see any meaningful shortage of IPv4. People in other countries don't have this luxury and have to rely on IPv6 and shitty CGNAT in order to stay online.

save

path: 0 1694550 1694679 1698357, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 1

ImpossibleRubiksCube -1 points 3 years ago

save

path: 0 1694550 1694679 1698357 1724547, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0

ono 15 points 3 years ago

Depends on where you are. It's a must-have in parts of the world that don't have enough IPv4 addresses.

save

path: 0 1694550 1694679 1695227, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0

zouden 10 points 3 years ago

I remember hearing that it meant every device could have a unique IP. But we still have NAT...

save

path: 0 1694550 1694679 1694877, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1

orangeboats 2 points 3 years ago

You don't have NATs in the IPv6 world...

save

path: 0 1694550 1694679 1694877 1769697, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

kinttach 5 points 3 years ago

You may have.

For example, T-Mobile in many places gives you an IPv6 address and uses CG-NAT for IPv4 — meaning you don’t have your own IPv4, but you do have a few quintillion “real” IPv6’s to yourself.

save

path: 0 1694550 1728907, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0

lowleveldata 19 points 3 years ago

How hard is it to support IPv6? Does it require new hardware?

save

path: 0 1698752, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 2

knower 18 points 3 years ago

I used to study networking, albeit at a pretty beginner level. IPv6 has been around for nearly 30 years at this point, so I'd be surprised if the hardware github uses doesn't support it. The impression I got was that it's pretty easy to extend an IPv4 address space so there isn't any rush to make a large scale move to IPv6 everywhere.

save

path: 0 1698752 1700156, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0

chaospatterns 12 points 3 years ago

It's not generally a hardware problem. It's a resourcing problem. Companies like GitHub will have complex software and architecture. IPv6 requires them to get a pool of IP addresses, come up with an IP address management strategy, make sure all hosts have IPv6 addresses meaning that now provisioning systems and tooling to management DNS has to plumb IPv6 addresses through too.

Then the software stack has to support it. Maybe their fraud detection or auditing systems have to now support IPv6 which means changes to API schemas.

None of this is a good reason why they shouldn't do it, but I've had to make similar decisions at my job as a software engineer on what looks to be simple but actually requires changes across systems.

save

path: 0 1698752 1725115, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0

rev 14 points 3 years ago

This is just sad.

save

path: 0 1694193, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0

kresten 12 points 3 years ago

Does gitlab.com have it?

save

path: 0 1696386, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1

kelvie 31 points 3 years ago

Name:   gitlab.com
Address: 172.65.251.78
Name:   gitlab.com
Address: 2606:4700:90:0:f22e:fbec:5bed:a9b9

save

path: 0 1696386 1696481, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 0

eternaldeiwos 10 points 3 years ago

Microsoft aren’t exactly big on implementing “the latest” stuff. Not at a keyboard currently but I’d be willing to bet GH doesn’t support TLS1.3 either.

save

path: 0 1695082, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 4

FredericChopin_ 4 points 3 years ago

save

path: 0 1695082 1695592, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3

atheken 2 points 3 years ago

Here: https://www.ssllabs.com/...

save

path: 0 1695082 1695592 1698729, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2

noli 9 points 3 years ago

Here: "yes it does support TLS1.3"

save

path: 0 1695082 1695592 1698729 1703323, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1

atheken 2 points 3 years ago

I shared the link partially because it’s a useful utility to check any public server TLS configs for vulnerabilities.

save

path: 0 1695082 1695592 1698729 1703323 1706146, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

astral_avocado 9 points 3 years ago

I've talked to several network engineers over the years about IPv6, engineers that work as hands on with actual production infrastructure as you can get. And they all said that IPv6 would likely never be fully adopted.

save

path: 0 1728502, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 6

Wats0ns 4 points 3 years ago

But why ?

save

path: 0 1728502 1754286, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 5

astral_avocado 0 points 3 years ago

I am not a full network engineer so take my opinion with a grain of salt. From what I understand, NAT with IPv4 works really really well to mitigate IPv4 address exhaustion. Then there's an issue with the amount of extra processing switches and routers need to do IPv6, we're going from 32 bits to 128 bits which is a huge increase and for switches and routers that are handling packets as fast as technically possible with a low amount of resources typically, that's a not insignificant hurdle.

It's just easier to do IPv4 in every way, plus that's what the world's been using and is used to.

save

path: 0 1728502 1754286 1781420, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2

orangeboats 5 points 3 years ago

You can't talk about NAT and then mention speed in the same statement...

The 128-bit IPv6 addresses are just four simple 32-bit integers if you think about it, but with NAT you have juggle around and maintain the (internal IP, internal Port, external IP, external Port, Protocol) tuples all the time. That's a significant overhead. Also, switches typically deal with the Layer 2 stuffs. IP is Layer 3.

See the HN discussion for more information.

It's just easier to do IPv4 in every way

Except when you have to NAT transversal. Then you are in a world of hurt.

save

path: 0 1728502 1754286 1781420 1801812, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1

astral_avocado 2 points 3 years ago

Well, there's the actual engineer response I was looking for

save

path: 0 1728502 1754286 1781420 1801812 1804199, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

whoisearth -2 points 3 years ago

My understanding is it's no longer that critical. The sky is no longer falling on IPv4

save

path: 0 1728502 1754286 1755588, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 1

orangeboats 2 points 3 years ago

The numerous CGNAT deployed worldwide suggests otherwise.

save

path: 0 1728502 1754286 1755588 1769623, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

iamak 9 points 3 years ago

I always use Github to check if my IPv4 DNS works lol (using ping). So it's definitely a feature /s

save

path: 0 1694083, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0

ImpossibleRubiksCube 9 points 3 years ago

save

path: 0 1724578, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2

sdoorex 5 points 3 years ago

You got off easy! I almost got stabbed in the heart by a nearby priest. Had to unpublish my name and leave his local area to get away.

save

path: 0 1724578 1725462, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1

ImpossibleRubiksCube 3 points 3 years ago

save

path: 0 1724578 1725462 1732553, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

malloc 8 points 3 years ago

Also a reminder for me to add IPv6 support for my personal site. I think most cloud providers are able to offer dual ipv4/v6 support if you ask for it/configure it.

save

path: 0 1726268, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0

wagesj45 7 points 3 years ago

Neither do I.

save

path: 0 1697617, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0

singinwhale 3 points 3 years ago

Isn't there a whole weird world of ipv6/V4 tunneling schemes that try to connect the two? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/... Not sure if anyone supports these though

save

path: 0 1726273, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1

astral_avocado 3 points 3 years ago

Yeah that's probably how your phone gets everywhere, since mobile networks are usually IPv6

save

path: 0 1726273 1728524, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

suckmyspez -12 points 3 years ago

Ok 🤷‍♂️

save

path: 0 1695246, hotness: undefined, score: -12, children: 0

Rules

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev

Rules

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev