ELI5: Google DRM bad

3 years ago by Wabbitsmiles to c/ELI5

Non-techy here, I've been seeing a lot of posts about Google DRM shenanigans, but don't really understand it, and what's 'bad' about it.

ELI5 please thank you

PathogenXD 26 points 3 years ago

Right now, you go to a url, which has a server behind it. Your browser says, "I'd like the site!". The server gives you the site, and your browser shows you the site and runs it for you. When you run the site, you may actually make modifications to the site in your browser, blocking ads, doing some custom stuff with extensions, etc.

Now, Google is essentially bringing something into their browser that allows servers to block any modifications to the site as you run it. And servers may automatically block any browsers that don't support that feature. Basically, servers will be able to ensure that you run the app in the exact way they intend, without modification

path: 0 1733036, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 10
PathogenXD 17 points 3 years ago

Oh, and why is bad: the server requires your browser to pass a check to see if it's going to run your code correctly (called an attestation). It asks a third party to do that check, which will most likely be Google. Guess which browsers are going to pass those attestations more easily? Chrome. The only possible benefit to the average person is that maybe this will make it more difficult for bot farms to access the web

path: 0 1733036 1733167, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 1
Wabbitsmiles 1 point 3 years ago

Is what you are describing similar to the experience of declining cookies on certain sites, and in turn, sites dont allow you to enter and redirect you to Google or a main page?

e.g. healthline.com

path: 0 1733036 1733167 1738408, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
glorious_albus 1 point 3 years ago path: 0 1733036 1733328, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Wabbitsmiles 1 point 3 years ago

A bit clearer now. But to my knowledge, Google does not 'own' the internet, it is just popular as a search engine, browser, emails+personal information.

What if the common man decides to another browser, say chrome or edge, and search engine such as duckduckgo or bing, how will Google's proposed changes affect such use cases?

path: 0 1733036 1735766, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 6
WindyRebel 10 points 3 years ago

Most browsers use Chromium as the basis of how it works and these are how we access the internet’s websites. Chromium was invented by Google and both browsers you mentioned run on Chromium.

It’s not that Google controls the internet, but the vehicle (your browser) you use kind of does. And most of the vehicles are built using the code from the company that wants to impose this.

Browsers not run on Chromium:

  • Safari
  • Firefox
  • Midori
  • Otter Browser
  • GNOME
  • A few others (you can search to find them out)
path: 0 1733036 1735766 1737090, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 5
Zer0Rank 4 points 3 years ago

I want to add Ladybird as one option for a new browser. It's still in its early days, but is under active development. I hope that one day it'll be in such a shape that it could be used as a daily driver. It's Open Source and built from scratch. It's awesome to follow the development of such a big project!

path: 0 1733036 1735766 1737090 1746483, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
hugz 1 point 3 years ago

Why Ladybird over firefox?

path: 0 1733036 1735766 1737090 1746483 1758463, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Very_Bad_Janet 1 point 3 years ago

Where can I get Ladybird for Android?

path: 0 1733036 1735766 1737090 1746483 1758923, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
ELI5
ELI5

@kbin.social

login for more options
569
30
1

Explain it to me like I am 5. Everybody should know what this is about.

go to feed...