Wondering what the people that were advising to wait for 50 series when 40s came out because nvidia hates even numbers and made the 40ies bad are thinking now.
NVIDIA’s GeForce RTX 5080 Comes Out Noticeably Slower Than RTX 4090, Gets Tested in Time Spy & Geekbench
2 years ago by Allah to c/technology
40ies
I can't help but read this as "forty-ies" instead of "forties" 😂
100s is 100 seconds
I’m glad I went ahead and bought a 4080S a few months ago.
Don't worry it makes up for it in fake frames..
no shit, it's a $1600 card vs a $1000 one
So for someone who has a 2080ti, should I go with a 50 series card? If so, would anyone have a recommendation? I don’t need it right away by any means, as I’ll need to save up for an upgrade if I even can. I just know that I will need to replace it as newer games come out.
I'm still rocking a 1060. I need to at least get a 2080ti or 3060ti
Right, without major architectural changes there's no reason to expect drivers to make a meaningful performance difference except in fixing particular workloads that are broken. Average performance should not be expected to move much.
40 series Nvidia was still humoring the raster crowd. 50 they are literally providing tools to tell you what your "real" frame rate should be. It's the same thing companies got burned at the stake for gaming benchmarks. This is what happens when you don't have enough competition. The industry leader starts selling bullshit quality dives off a cliff.
@lemmy.world
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
go to feed...
save