Special counsel obtained search warrant for Donald Trump’s Twitter account

3 years ago by MicroWave to c/news

The special counsel investigation into Donald Trump secured a search warrant of the former president’s Twitter account, @realDonaldTrump, according to a newly unsealed court filing.

load all comments
MicroWave 143 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2243330, hotness: undefined, score: 143, children: 28
FlyingSquid 53 points 3 years ago

Are we going to see more bullshit "Twitter Files" about how the evil government dared to exercise a legal search warrant?

path: 0 2243330 2243874, hotness: undefined, score: 53, children: 10
open_world 85 points 3 years ago

Actually, it's just "The X-Files" now.

path: 0 2243330 2243874 2244353, hotness: undefined, score: 85, children: 4
marketing-BB201 -4 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2243330 2243874 2244263, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 1
plebonix -16 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2243330 2243874 2244998, hotness: undefined, score: -16, children: 2
DougHolland 40 points 3 years ago

Yeah, THAT'S what CNN should've said in the headline. Investigations into Trump are so ordinary now they're barely news, but Twitter ignoring the law and the search warrant — that ought to be big news.

There are still serious news sites and government agencies using Twitter, something that's been feeling more and more problematic to me. It would be nice if today's news started a groundswell, or at least a conversation about that. Twitter has made itself into a forum for nutters, and now this? To anyone who's still on Twitter, I would ask — Why?

path: 0 2243330 2245837, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 0
rastilin 18 points 3 years ago

Yes, that's generally how electronic record searches go. I don't get why "secret" is bolded, since any of us would be getting the exact same treatment if there was a warrant for our own accounts. This at least is equitable in that it's equally unfair under the laws that these very same people had no problem with when they were in power.

path: 0 2243330 2244234, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
athos77 17 points 3 years ago

sought the warrant in January 2023.

So after Musk took over. I have no doubt Musk tried to obstruct as much as possible.

path: 0 2243330 2245309, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
girlfreddy 7 points 3 years ago path: 0 2243330 2243506, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
LEDZeppelin 5 points 3 years ago

That’s $44,000,350,000 in total after taxes. Would that be cash or credit card?

path: 0 2243330 2245870, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Alto 4 points 3 years ago

Still not a fan of secret subpoenas/warrants/whatever, but fuck that's funny

path: 0 2243330 2243967, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 9
Falmarri 20 points 3 years ago

This is different from a FISA warrant I think. It's not that it was "secret", in that it won't ever be public. Just that they didn't tell trump first, which as far as I know is pretty standard

path: 0 2243330 2243967 2245181, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 8
Rakonat 3 points 3 years ago

I wish we saw more stuff like this with corps being slapped around even a little bit where it hurts (their bank account) when they drag their feet or don't comply.

path: 0 2243330 2258020, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
marketing-BB201 -5 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2243330 2244255, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 0
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
38072
38649
9388

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...