House votes to claw back $9.4bn in spending including from NPR and PBS
a year ago by DeadWorld to c/brainworms
cross-posted from: https://rss.ponder.cat/post/205556
From US news | The Guardian via this RSS feed
That's not at all what that means.
Claw back implies money (or something else) has already been sent out and is trying to once again be retrieved from the receiving party.
Informed Americans are a threat to American conservatives and/or Republicans: it's best to keep them stupid.
@lemm.ee
Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.
This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness
go to feed...
@lemm.ee
Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.
This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness
go to feed...
To be clear, they're cutting an extra $9.4 Billion in services. Maybe it's used differently in British English but in the US "claw back" as an idiom generally refers to a win for an underdog party to keep something after a difficult fight, not a privileged party ending access to something.
save