Opinion | Your Brain Has Tricked You Into Thinking Everything Is Worse

3 years ago by mem_somerville_kbin to c/science

Our biased attention means we’ll always feel like we’re living in dark times, and our biased memory means we’ll always feel like the past was brighter.

borkcorkedforks 14 points 3 years ago

I mean we just limped through a pandemic, have rising inflation (no wages haven't keep up for decades), could see a recession/depression soon, kinda need to be worried about fascism again, and have climate change to deal with. I probably forgot about some stuff too.

The past is often tented in our minds either due to limited information of that time or because we were a kid at the time. It is also true that a lot of stuff is better. Still, people have good reason to worry about the current state of the world.

path: 0 381082, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0

Naich 12 points 3 years ago

I'd say that objectively, the mid to latter part of the 90s was pretty good. The iron curtain had fallen, there weren't any major economic disasters, the world wouldn't go batshit until after 9-11, and the internet wasn't full of complete arseholes.

path: 0 381910, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 7

mem_somerville_kbin 15 points 3 years ago

Well...a lot of people were dying of AIDS then. And there was a lot of hostility to the gay community. I think it depends on your perspective.

I love history, and spend a lot of time thinking about it, reading about it, talking about it. But there's really no time I'd like to travel to as a unmarried, not Christian, education-craving female. YMMV.

path: 0 381910 383326, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 3

meat_popsicle 4 points 3 years ago

How much have global temps gone up since then? How much BPA/PFOA/PFAS has been released into the ecosystem since then? How many once-in-a-lifetime economic calamities have we had? How many more school shootings do we have per year now than before?

I think you have to look at the complete picture and not just some key points regarding demographic improvements. LGBT kids get shot in schools too, LGBT people lose their jobs and become homeless too.

There were great improvements in some areas, but we need to be circumspect on the broader declines.

path: 0 381910 383326 385141, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2

0x1C3B00DA 4 points 3 years ago

So what are you saying? That the middle of the AIDS crisis was a better time to be a gay man than now because there's still a chance they may be shot today? LGBT people can still become homeless today, like anyone else, but it was way more prevalent a few decades ago when it was legal to fire them for being LGBT.

It seems to me, most of the improvements were in raising the floor of society (disallowing discrimination based on various factors) which generally go ignored by more privileged people like myself. But the recent declines lowered the ceiling of society in ways that affect everyone, but less than the gains made by minority/oppressed peoples in recent decades.

path: 0 381910 383326 385141 387242, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0

mem_somerville_kbin 3 points 3 years ago

So what past time is your ideal?

path: 0 381910 383326 385141 386563, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

FrostBolt 2 points 3 years ago

Agree that the US was more stable back then, but it largely depends on what part of the world you called home. This happened around then, which is one of the most horrific events in human history:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rwandan_genocide

path: 0 381910 388720, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

nivenkos 2 points 3 years ago

For parts of the USA sure.

Meanwhile Algeria and the Balkan states had terrible civil wars.

path: 0 381910 391284, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

Pons_Aelius 1 point 3 years ago

the mid to latter part of the 90s was pretty good.

While yes, the threat of Nuclear War subsided, we were well into the "ignoring climate change and thus ensuring the next century would have to pay the inevitable toll" phase.

path: 0 381910 392792, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

XGC75 7 points 3 years ago

Negativity bias is objectively consistent and has been known for quite a while. It's important we balance that out with an intentional focus on positive thinking.

path: 0 383550, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0

mem_somerville_kbin 6 points 3 years ago

Well, I think Reddark is really legit dark. But I agree on the other points. Your brain stores negative stuff more than positive stuff. But the last line is the kicker:

As long as we believe in this illusion, we are susceptible to the promises of aspiring autocrats who claim they can return us to a golden age that exists in the only place a golden age has ever existed: our imaginations.

Here is their accompanying paper: The illusion of moral decline https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06137-x

path: 0 378847, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0

rebul 5 points 3 years ago

Nostalgia: The amnesia of bad events in your past.

path: 0 386238, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0

burgersc12 3 points 3 years ago

path: 0 391077, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5

Nessussus 1 point 3 years ago

@burgersc12 Can you provide a peer reviewed paper that makes that prediction about extinction?

@mem_somerville_kbin

path: 0 391077 471285, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2

burgersc12 0 points 3 years ago

path: 0 391077 471285 503584, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1

Nessussus 1 point 3 years ago

@burgersc12 So the answer is no, you can't. "Extinction" is not a part of it. Let's not use hyperbolic language. It hurts our cause, and gives the fossil fuel lackeys ammunition.

@mem_somerville_kbin

path: 0 391077 471285 503584 503585, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

nivenkos 1 point 3 years ago

Why be pessimistic still though? The sun will go supernova in a few million years too.

Enjoy the lifetime you have.

path: 0 391077 391247, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1

BrerChicken 2 points 3 years ago

It's not a few million years, it's 4 or 5 BILLION years. And also it's not big enough to go supernova. It'll lose its outer layers (which will vaporize Earth and the other rocky planets!), and end up a white dwarf.

path: 0 391077 391247 391697, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

@kbin.social

login for more options

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

go to feed...

@kbin.social

login for more options

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

go to feed...