"For you" isn't - The case against corporate algorithmic feeds

3 years ago by JustinHanagan to c/technology

The case against algorithmic feeds
b1tstremist0 29 points 3 years ago

I really wish there were apps like LibreTube for all the other popular socials to circumvent "For You".

path: 0 2645202, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 4
Anticorp 5 points 3 years ago

Amazon has started this bullshit "for you" crap with lists. You know wish lists, the things you create to keep track of stuff you'd like to purchase, or share with others as gift ideas? If you're going there it's because you are ready to make a purchase of something that you want or need. But making a purchase isn't enough anymore? They're like "look at all this other shit we'd rather have you buy, instead of the stuff you want to buy". What in the actual fuck? Go away! Get fucked. Die!

path: 0 2645202 2655355, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
JustinHanagan 2 points 3 years ago

I personally am a big advocate of "no entertainment on mobile devices" whatsoever, but that said- I've played around with this modified version of Instagram and it's pretty cool. I don't think it changes the sort to chronological, but it does remove suggested content and allows users to turn off stories, reels and more (use at your own risk, I have no idea the safety of this).

path: 0 2645202 2645900, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Polydextrous 6 points 3 years ago

Since changing from Reddit to Lemmy, I’m absolutely pulling out my phone to browse mindlessly far less. And I’m back to reading articles in full.

I’m not sure even what it is about Reddit that made the app much more addictive. BecauseI was all third party since I was on Reddit, so I didn’t get the “recommended” Bullshit. Maybe it was the really specifically (self) tailored endless feed whereas with Lemmy I’m browsing all instances, a bunch of weird shit pops up that when an article I’m actually interested in comes across, I’m all in.

But I was also never on social media besides Reddit, so I wasn’t filling a void? I dunno

path: 0 2645202 2645900 2651453, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
FlexibleToast 3 points 3 years ago

Is this open source or vetted in any way? I love the idea, but I don't want to just install some apk from a random site.

path: 0 2645202 2645900 2653136, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
steltek 15 points 3 years ago

The choice between "Algorithm" and "Chronological" is a false dichotomy. Lemmy has several choices and the default for me is "active", not chronological. And why can't I have multiple separate streams of subscriptions by a grouping of my choice?

path: 0 2646309, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 6
JustinHanagan 19 points 3 years ago

The essay is not about suggesting a dichotomy. The article is about how corporations sort their content feeds based on maximizing profitability, and the subsequent consequences that result for the end user (humans) in the form of endless distractions.

path: 0 2646309 2649021, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 3
Deftdrummer 1 point 3 years ago

What's the story for Lemmy then? With no corporate interests behind the scenes, what metrics is Lemmy using to sort?

path: 0 2646309 2649021 2650511, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
JustinHanagan 16 points 3 years ago

Lemmy devs actually publish their goals/methods for "hot" and "active" sorting here. You may find it of value!

The important difference, imo, is that Fediverse users have final say over the sorting of their own feeds. Reddit/Twitter/etc prioritize engagement, not actual value added to the user.

path: 0 2646309 2649021 2650511 2650949, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 1
Deftdrummer 1 point 3 years ago

Thanks for the link!

path: 0 2646309 2649021 2650511 2650949 2661807, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
wahming 6 points 3 years ago

They specifically held up lemmy as a good option and example of the way things should be...

path: 0 2646309 2649330, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
steltek 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2646309 2649330 2649505, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
neptune 9 points 3 years ago

Limbic capitalism. Good stuff.

Yeah, free market people really either love the idea of legalizing heroin OR pretending their is a clean and obvious line between what should be illegal in a free market and what's just kind of bad and reasonable people can control their urges over.

path: 0 2646009, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
thisbenzingring 5 points 3 years ago

Good read. Thank you Justin.

path: 0 2654355, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
JustinHanagan 4 points 3 years ago

You are most welcome!

path: 0 2654355 2656609, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
djquadratic 4 points 3 years ago

Interesting article, I really liked it! I appreciated the link you made to keeping junk food in the house to encourage people to delete those apps off the phone. I wonder if the junkie statements at the beginning might be a turnoff to readers who might be on the fence (if that’s an audience you’re trying to appeal to)

path: 0 2645209, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
djquadratic 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2645204, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
88891
22269
14630

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...