Seems the summary of the report is available here if anyone is interested.
At any rate, very weird that Bowser (presumably) tried to bury this. Obviously it was going to be big news and I think people would have more respect for an Administration that was up front with the public. If the report is indeed honest (and it does report two of the claims are substantiated), why would you bury it and give the appearance of dishonesty? And with the two substantiated claims, there's no way Falcicchio's coming back--so who would gain from not just being open and honest?
Seems the summary of the report is available here if anyone is interested.
At any rate, very weird that Bowser (presumably) tried to bury this. Obviously it was going to be big news and I think people would have more respect for an Administration that was up front with the public. If the report is indeed honest (and it does report two of the claims are substantiated), why would you bury it and give the appearance of dishonesty? And with the two substantiated claims, there's no way Falcicchio's coming back--so who would gain from not just being open and honest?
save