100% and they also didn’t need to be total tools about it. giving a month window is a joke, being snarky assholes answering AMAs, telling their user base that profitability is the only thing that matters to them.
Surprising nobody, Reddit continues to make really awful business decisions. This is just another nail in their coffin.
The original announcement said they were making exceptions for applications that gave back to Reddit. I and many others hoped that was basically everyone who wasn't AI scraping. But seems like they got greedy while they were at it and decided to kill everything
I am sorry but you don't know what you are talking about. These things are regulated by legal documents, you don't just wake up on morning and say "trust me bro, their data is public"
If you go and read their TnC's it explicitly statea that scraping is forbidden without prioir written consent. They only allow access to their data via APIs, which of course they charge for
The fact that it can be easily scraped it's neither here nor there, if they catch you they can sue you
I'm still perplexed that some people are siding with evil ass Getty in that case. At least the copilot case has some merit but I don't see how Microsoft could lose as that would set precedent for whole AI in the US and no way US is letting that disadvantage to happen. It's meme-level lawsuits.
Nah Terms of Service is not enforcable through browse wrap agreement in the US and most of EU. You can't implicitly agree with a legal document just by looking at something.
Check out LinkedIn v Hiq case which went to 9th circuit and set the precedent for this. LinkedIn lost.
Unless I'm mistaken and something is different, this hasn't been a problem for tools like newpipe, YouTube vanced, and fritter.
Could they have something to do with it? Yes, for sure. But the thing is that they didn't have to do any of this the way they did. They could have made an API plan that allowed third party apps to still exist/thrive, and also charge big companies that just want to use reddit to train LLM's. Change the pricing/terms based around this idea. They deliberately went after third party apps, and then double and tripled down on it in the face of massive backlash. If spez was competent, he would have been able to better pivot this conversation and make it about training LLM's for megacorps, but he didn't and even then it would have still been bullshit that is easily seen past.
The value of LLM's has changed drastically in favor of open source since the Meta weights leak. The proprietary model looks pretty much wrecked now, at least as far as I understand the leaked internal memo from a google researcher last month.
What "law" says that? That's not how copyright works at all. If you don't have an explicit license to use content you don't own, you can't legally use it.
At least seven proxies.
Like, why go after Selig like that if it was about AI?
Why not have a cheaper legacy tier (not even free, just cheaper) so Apollo and other third party apps could stay in business? Only AI needs to get charged the higher price. Instead, it seems there's essentially only one tier and third party apps simply can't afford to pay it.
I'm very sure that this is the case. Reddit is pissed they gave away all the content as training data for free while struggling to monetize their platform adequately.
But I suspect the damage is already done. There are projects like "Orca" from Microsoft that skip the learning process from source data for a big part by using chatGPT and GPT4.
They missed the timing but are too stubborn and double down on it
What's more, chat-gpt 4 is near the upper bound of what you can collect on the web in that way. They basically took everywhere you'd look to for information and grabbed it along with as much structure as they could... There's plenty more information on the Internet, but the structure and quality are much lower. It's very data poor and unstructured interactions between humans
Moving forward, everyone is talking about synthetic data sets - you can't go bigger without some system to generate (or refine) training data - and if you have to generate the data anyways, you're not going to pay much for a dataset that is just decent
So yeah, Reddit most definitely missed the timing.
I think Elon's claims that he's made Twitter profitable (despite a lot of evidence to the contrary) is also creating pressure for the other social networks to chase overly aggressive monetization schemes
Yup. AI consumers are more profitable than 3rd party apps. why focus on tiered pricing when you can just name a price point everyone has to pay that only huge AI companies are willing to.
Reddit gets their content for free. Reselling it at a high price to AI/ML consumers is an easy way to turn free content into profit with almost no effort.
It is, but reddit don’t own the content on their site according to their TOS, posters merely grant them a license to redistribute it. So it’s not really their call to shut off ChatGPT scraping, it should be a community decision
"Merely" - the TOS basically grant Reddit the ability to do what the hell they want with it, LOL
When Your Content is created with or submitted to the Services, you grant us a worldwide, royalty-free, perpetual, irrevocable, non-exclusive, transferable, and sublicensable license to use, copy, modify, adapt, prepare derivative works of, distribute, store, perform, and display Your Content and any name, username, voice, or likeness provided in connection with Your Content in all media formats and channels now known or later developed anywhere in the world. This license includes the right for us to make Your Content available for syndication, broadcast, distribution, or publication by other companies, organizations, or individuals who partner with Reddit.
And furthermore
You also agree that we may remove metadata associated with Your Content, and you irrevocably waive any claims and assertions of moral rights or attribution with respect to Your Content.
I think this is the main reason for the insane prices, but it could have easily been avoided. They don't need to have one price class for every type of use of their Data API. They could have easily had one rate for LLM and other AI training uses and another for third party client applications. I feel like at some point they realized they'd rather just kill the third parties while they're at it and this seemed like the logical moment.
Reddit's business model was not founded on selling LLM data. Reddit got greedy and decided to change their business model to cash in on an unexpected revenue stream. What was also unexpected (to Reddit) is that you cannot cater to social media users and monetize their data for LLM training effectively at the same time. And now Reddit will have neither, and will die just like all other businesses that adopt Enshitification as a core operating procedure.
Let this be a lesson to them and all that follow: do not let your greed make you blind to the consequences of your actions.
Does it matter what Reddit's business model was founded on? Businesses respond to changing conditions all the time and pivot.
"they got greedy" seems really a naive way of looking at it. They are a business, that's what businesses are all about. Additionally, they are a busienss which is NOT profitable, and need to to change things to survive now that the era of low interest rates has come to end. The real issue is that they are so inept IMHO
I find the word "entshittification" so cringe
Surprisingly tough question. On one hand, I don't think every ex-Reddit user should go "Nah, it's too late, fam" because then it wouldn't even make sense for the devs to make any changes if they had no chance of regaining their userbase. On the other hand, I feel like even if they made really good changes, I would still always be on edge waiting for the bad thing to happen (pretty much what I imagine an abusive relationship to be like).
I think that was definitely the impetus - I first read about the changes in this article back in April: https://www.theregister.com/...
The closing statement is interesting:
The spokesperson we talked to also wanted to make clear the Data API was still freely accessible for appropriate use cases through the Reddit developer platform; hopefully app developers and other small-scale operators won't have any surprises ahead this summer.
I suspect they ran the numbers and started seeing dollar signs - they don't care about the third-party apps (which don't make them any money directly), they're just trying to cash in on Microsoft etc.
I have a sneaking suspicion they're going to end up back-pedalling, but it will be too little, too late.
They could have created better licensing models. It does rely on people honoring the agreements but besides countries that disregard IPs I think its a viable model. Their business is social media, not curating datasets.
I think the LLM wave hit, they saw dollar signs, and they made a change without thinking it through, but then they were backed into a corner between money and avoiding outrage, but greed won over.
This contains a good explanation of why it's clear this is really about wanting the 3rd party apps to stop existing.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...
Yes, but it could have been handled better. If ai was the problem they could have gone the route of api only being allowed after an application process so they know who is using it and everyone else trying to use it would get denied until they were assigned a key
save